Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 10319 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 July, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 109/2019
Supar Kanwar W/o Sh. Samundra Singh, Aged About 72 Years, B/c Rajput , R/o Ward No 2, Sainik Colony Rajgarh , Tehsil Rajgarh , Distt. Churu (Raj.)
----Appellant Versus Sona W/o Pappu Khan, B/c Damami , R/o Ward No 11, Subhash Nagar Rajgarh , Tehsil Rajgarh , Distt. Churu (Raj.)
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. D.S. Gharsana For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA
Judgment
08/07/2021
The applicant-complainant Smt. Supar Kanwar has
approached this Court through this leave to appeal application
under Section 378 (4) Cr.P.C. seeking leave to file an appeal
against the judgment of acquittal dated 07.02.2019 passed by
learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajgarh District Churu in Complaint
Case No.172/2016 (575/15)
I have given my thoughtful consideration to the submissions
advanced at bar and have gone through the impugned judgment
and the record.
After going through the impugned judgment and the original
record, it is clear that the applicant-complainant filed the
complaint with a specific assertion that the cheque in question was
given to her by the respondent accused after appending her
thumb impression thereupon. The respondent took a pertinent
(2 of 2) [CRLLA-109/2019]
plea before the trial court that she had no bank account. This
assertion of the respondent is fortified from the fact that Return
Memo (Ex.P/5) itself bears a remark that the cheque was not
issued. Admittedly, the respondent accused is an illiterate lady and
cannot even append her signatures.
It is common knowledge that the banks would not issue
cheque book to an illiterate person who cannot append a
signature. Thus, I am of the firm opinion that the findings
recorded by the trial court in the impugned judgment while
acquitting the respondent from the offence punishable under
Section 138 of the N.I. Act was the only possible view of the
matter. Hence, there is no justification in the prayer of the
applicant-complainant for granting leave to file appeal against the
impugned judgment dated 07.02.2019. Accordingly, the leave to
appeal application fails and is dismissed as being devoid of merit.
The original record shall be returned to the trial court
forthwith.
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J 81-Sudhir Asopa/-
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!