Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 876 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 28 January, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 289/2021
Pawan Khandelwal S/o Shri Giriraj Prasad Khandelwal, Aged
About 27 Years, R/o Plot No. 464-A, Surya City, Near Tilak
Hospital, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.)
----Accused-Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
2. Victim, D/o Shri Bamb Barman, Aged About 28 Years, R/o CA-2, Putti Mari, Kotwali, Bihar Kooch, West Bengal at present residing at B-18, Akshat Kanak Brabha, Rajendra Marg, Bapu Nagar, Jaipur (East), Rajasthan
----Complainant-Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Pratap Singh Chouhan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Atul Sharma, PP Mr. Aniket Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Order
28/01/2021
This petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to
quash the FIR No.06/2021 dated 06.01.2021 registered at Police
Station Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East) for the offence under
Sections 376, 313, 341 & 34 of I.P.C.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that FIR came
to be lodged by the complainant/respondent No.2 under
misconception and now the petitioner as well as the complainant,
both being major, have solemnized marriage on 15.01.2021 as per
Hindu rites and ceremonies. He submitted an agreement dated
15.01.2021 in this regard which is taken on record. Learned
(2 of 2) [CRLMP-289/2021]
counsel submitted that in view of marriage between the petitioner
and complainant, it is in the interest of justice that the FIR in
question be quashed. He relied upon the judgments of this Court
in cases of Sunil Kumar & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr.,
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.7151/2019dated
29.11.2019 and Dalveer Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan &
Anr., S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No.4504/2018
dated 03.01.2019 in support of his submissions.
Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the criminal
miscellaneous petition.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent
No.2/complainant acknowledging the factum of marriage between
the parties, submitted that he has no objection if the FIR in
question is quashed.
Heard learned counsels for the parties and perused the
record.
The complainant alongwith her counsel is present in Court
and she has also acknowledged the factum of her marriage with
the petitioner.
In view of marriage between the parties and the law laid
down by this Court in the cases of Sunil Kumar (supra) and
Dalveer Singh (supra), this Court deems it just and proper to
quash the FIR in question.
Consequently, this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed.
The FIR No.06/2021 dated 06.01.2021 registered at Police Station
Gandhi Nagar, Jaipur City (East) is quashed.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
PRAGATI/86
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!