Rajasthan High Court
Kamal Kumar Saini Son Of Shri ... vs State Of Rajasthan on 25 January, 2021
Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13763/2020
1. Kamal Kumar Saini Son Of Shri Buddhi Prakash Saini,
Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Ward No.2, Mattanga Ki
Dhani, Chaksu, Jaipur (Raj)-303901.
2. Ganesh Meena Son Of Shri Moolchand Meena, Resident Of
Pandya Wali Dhani, Near Railway Line, Bambala,
Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj)-302033.
3. Lalit Mohan Sharma Son Of Shri Suraj Bhan Sharma,
Resident Of 537, Krishna Nagar, Madarpur, Bharatpur
(Raj).
4. Sher Singh Yadav Son Of Shri Roshan Lal Yadav, Resident
Of Ganv Hajipur, Tehsil Bansur, Alwar (Raj)-301402.
5. Jugal Kishor Swami Son Of Shri Pukhraj Swami, Resident
Of 47, Santosh Nagar, Tonk (Raj)-304001.
6. Mahesh Chand Son Of Nanak Chand, Resident Of Village
Post Harsoli, Tehsil Kotkasim, Alwar (Raj)-301403.
7. Bhagchand Sharma Son Of Ramu Lal Sharma, Resident Of
Village Post Teetariya, Via Shivdaspura, Tehsil Chaksu,
Jaipur (Raj)-303903.
8. Ramawatar Swami Son Of Shri Pokhar Swami, Resident
Of Village Dobriya, Tehsil And Post Uniyara, Tonk (Raj)-
304024.
9. Yogesh Kumar Son Of Banshi Lal Balai, Resident Of
Kilkipura, Tehsil Chaksu, Jaipur (Raj)-303903
10. Surendra Kumar Aloriya Son Of Bhonri Lal Raigar,
Resident Of Raigaro Ka Mohalla Village - Ramchandrapura
Post Vidhani Tehsil - Sanganer, Jaipur (Raj)- 303905
11. Hari Om Meena Son Of Bhanwar Lal Meena, Resident Of
Gram Shanpur, Balwan, Bundi(Raj)-323614.
12. Dr. Sahdev Pareek Son Of Krishan Chander Pareek,
Resident Of Ward No. 11, Near Water Works, Tehsil
Sadulshahar, 36Ptp, (Maniyanwali) Ganganagar(Raj)-
335062.
13. Lalit Jangu Son Of Shri Shreekishan Jangu, Resident Of
Village - Gunsali, Tehsil Degana, Nagaur (Raj)-341301
C/o Kishor Bainda Anil Agarwal, Plot No.79, Salasar Vatika
4, Niwaru Road, Jothwara, Jaipur 302012
(Downloaded on 25/01/2021 at 10:32:37 PM)
(2 of 3) [CW-13763/2020]
14. Ashok Kumar Meena Son Of Gainda Lal Meena, Resident
Of Burja Ki Dhani, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, Sikar (Raj)-
332705.
15. Sharda Devi Daughter Of Ishwar Lal Meena, Resident Of
Gram Bhudoli, Teshil Neem Ka Thana, Sikar (Raj)-
332713.
16. Pradeep Meena Son Of Madho Lal Meena, Resident Of
Village Guwadi, Post Bhairoopura Ojha, Tehsil And District
Bundi (Raj)-323803.
17. Suresh Kumar Yadav Son Of Ganpat Lal Yadav, Resident
Of Village Post Dhoblai Govindgarh, Tehsil Chomu, Jaipur
(Raj)-303712.
18. Bhimraj Mahayach Son Of Sahabram Mahayach, Resident
Of Village Post Dhandhela, Tehsil Nohar, Hanumangarh
(Raj)-335523.
19. Satyander Son Of Sahab Ram Mahayach, Village Post
Dhandhela, Tehsil Nohar, Hanumangarh (Raj)-335523.
20. Prahlad Kumar Son Of Chothu Ram, Resident Of Harijan
Basti, Jheegar Chhoti, Jheegar, Sikar (Raj)-332024.
21. Harendra Kumar Sharma Son Of Siyaram Sharma,
Resident Of Rajiv Colony, Behind Lic Colony, Ajmer
(Raj)305001.
22. Vijay Kumar Sukhwal Son Of Satyanarayan, Resident Of
Hisniya Alamas Mandal, Bhilwara, At Present C/o Sushila
Bhargatiya, 332 Keshav Nagar, Vaishali Nagar Ajmer Pin.
305004.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Higher
Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of
Personnel, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur
3. State Of Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary, Higher
Education (Gr-Iii) Department, Government Of Rajasthan,
Secretariat, Jaipur.
4. Commissioner, Commisionerate Of College Education,
Government Of Rajasthan, Block-Iv, Doctor S.
Radhakrishan Shiksha Sankul, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg,
(Downloaded on 25/01/2021 at 10:32:37 PM)
(3 of 3) [CW-13763/2020]
Jaipur, 302015.
5. Rajasthan Public Service Commission (Rpsc), Through Its
Secretary Ajmer.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prashant Kumar Dubey
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
25/01/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ
petition has been rendered infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the counsel for the
petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as having become
infructuous.
All pending applications also stands disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SAURABH YADAV /670/12
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
