Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Deep Shikha Trivedi vs State Of Rajasthan on 5 January, 2021

Bench: Arun Bhansali

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12561/2020

1. Deep Shikha Trivedi W/o Hitendra Trivedi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Dei, Tehsil Nainwan, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

2. Ritu Joshi D/o Mahesh Prasad, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Khemura, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

3. Chanana Ram S/o Badri Lal, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Baap, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

4. Shiv Narayan Dholi S/o Bakshi Ram Dholi, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gangrar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

5. Sunil Kumar Trivedi S/o Durga Shankar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Salumbar, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

6. Ashok Kumar Sakrawat S/o Ganga Ram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Salumbar, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

7. Ramsingh Solanki S/o Heer Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Khamnor, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

8. Ganpat Lal S/o Hira Lal, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Walera Sayla, District Jalore, Rajasthan.

9. Bharat Lal Bujh S/o Hukla Ji Bujh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Anandpuri, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

10. Sahnaz Sheikh D/o Abdul Aziz, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sharada, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

11. Arti Upadhaya D/o Jitendra Upadhaya, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Khemura, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

12. Jyotika Vyas D/o Laxman Vyas, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ghatol, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

13. Seema Sharma D/o Mahesh Chandra Sharma, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Gangrar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

14. Prabhu Lal Mali S/o Mangi Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

15. Kirti Thripathi D/o Monish Kumar Sharma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Gangrar, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan.

16. Akhil Vyas S/o Natwar Lal Vyas, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Chich, Bagidora District Banswara, Rajasthan.

17. Ramchandra Pargi S/o Phool Chand, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Anandpuri, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

18. Apurva Trivedi D/o Rajkumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Raipur, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

19. Dinesh Kumar S/o Shiv Prakash, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Osian, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

20. Lakhan Singh Solanki S/o Shiv Singh Solanki, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Khamnor, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

21. Anjana Bhoi D/o Shree Ramesh Chandra Bhoi, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Simalwara, District Dungarpur, Rajasthan.

(2 of 4) [CW-12561/2020]

22. Pooja Maratha D/o Vimal Kumar Chauhan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

23. Seema Pancholi W/o Shyam Sunder Vyas, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Mandalgarh, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

24. Ashafaq Mirasee S/o Badrudeen Mirasee, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Sajangarh, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

25. Badrudeen Mirashi S/o Mangi Lal Mirashi, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Sarada, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

26. Kishan Lal Dholi S/o Deva Ji Dholi, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Sarada, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

27. Premaram Geva S/o Kalaram Geva, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Jaisalmer, District Jaisalmer, Rajasthan.

28. Santosh Chouhan D/o Nathji Chouhan, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Chich, Bagidora, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

29. Shelbala Soni, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Chich, Bagidora, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

30. Dinesh Harijan S/o Bheru Lal Harijan, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Kotari, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

31. Gopal Harijan S/o Shobharam, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Kotari, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

32. Mahaveer Vaishnav S/o Udai Lal Vaishnav, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Kotari, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

33. Sanjiv Kumar Vaishnav S/o Ramprasad Vaishnav, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Kotari, District Bhilwara, Rajasthan.

34. Sunder Patel S/o Manji Patel, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Salumber, District Udaipur, Rajasthan.

35. Asha Pargi D/o Kailash Chand Pargi, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Anandpuri, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

36. Kishan Lal Jat S/o Ratan Lal Jat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Railmagra, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan.

37. Swaroop Khan S/o Shri Kuchta Khan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Gadra, District Barmer, Rajasthan.

38. Hemlata Jaga D/o Dalchand Jaga, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Reni, Alwar, Rajasthan.

39. Harishankar Bharti S/o Nand Kishor Bharti, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Talera, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

40. Ashok Kumar Bharti S/o Om Prakash Bharti, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Nainwa, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

41. Dinesh Kumar Bairagi S/o Ram Laxman, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Hindoli, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

42. Lokesh Kumar Sharma S/o Shree Shambhu Dayal Sharma, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Talera, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

43. Anita Sharma D/o Shree Omprakash Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Kishangarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

44. Mukesh Kumar Bairwa S/o Bishan Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Barudhan Taleda, District Bundi, Rajasthan.

(3 of 4) [CW-12561/2020]

45. Raheena Mirasee W/o Hamid Mirasee, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Boli, District Swaimadhopur, Rajasthan.

46. Sangeeta W/o Lokesh Kumar Johsi, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ramgarh, District Alwar, Rajasthan.

47. Kosar Kureshi W/o Anwar Husain, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Sajjangarh, District Banswara, Rajasthan.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of School And Sanskrit Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)

2. State Project Director, Rajasthan Council Of Secondary Education Dr. Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, Block-6 Jln Marg, Jaipur Jaipur Rajasthan.

3. Additional State Project Director, Rajasthan Council Of Secondary Education Dr. Radhakrishnan Shiksha Sankul, Block-6 Jln Marg, Jaipur Jaipur Rajasthan.

                                                                ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. Vikram Singh Bhati (through VC)
For Respondent(s)        :


        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHANSALI
                       Order
05/01/2021

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the issue

raised in the present writ petition is similar to the issue raised in

Mukesh Kumar Khatik v. State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.5049/2014, decided on 01.09.2014, which judgment

has been followed in Gopiram Gurjar & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan

& Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10695/2018, decided on

16.05.2018 at Jaipur Bench.

It is submitted that in the said judgment directions have

been given for deciding the representation to be made by the

petitioners in light of the law laid down therein and therefore, the

petitioners may also be granted same relief.

(4 of 4) [CW-12561/2020]

In the case of Gopiram Gurjar (supra), it was observed and

directed by a Co-ordinate Bench as under :-

"It is further contended that for the present; the petitioners would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, within a time frame, in the light of the adjudication in the case of Mukesh Kumar Khatik (supra), which they are ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter. In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioners to address a comprehensive ventilating the grievances raised in the writ application.

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than ten weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.