Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Surendra Pratap Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 232 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 232 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Surendra Pratap Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 7 January, 2021
Bench: Manoj Kumar Garg

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 4300/2020

Surendra Pratap Singh S/o Sh. Bhanwar Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Plot No. 103, Sushant City, Near Bhakrasani Gaon, Pali Road, District Jodhpur (Raj.).

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

2. Smt. Praveen Kanwar @ Pintu W/o Sh. Surendra Pratap Singh, Aged About 31 Years, R/o House No. 452, Mohan Nagar, Near Gupta Store, B.j.s. Colony, Jodhpur (Raj.).

3. Mahaveer Pratap Singh S/o Sh. Surendra Pratap Singh, Aged About 7 Years, R/o House No. 452, Mohan Nagar, Near Gupta Store, B.J.S. Colony, Jodhpur (Raj.). Through His Mother Smt. Praveen Kanwar @ Pintu.

4. Pawan Pratap Singh S/o Sh. Surendra Pratap Singh, Aged About 5 Years, R/o House No. 452, Mohan Nagar, Near Gupta Store, B.J.S. Colony, Jodhpur (Raj.). Through His Mother Smt. Praveen Kanwar @ Pintu.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Ravinder Singh Champawat, through video-call.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudhir Tak, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Judgment / Order

07/01/2021

The instant criminal misc. petition has been filed by the

petitioner-husband against the order dated 20.01.2020 passed by

the learned Judge, Family Court No.2, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, in

Criminal Regular Case No. 12/2019(120/2019), whereby the learned

Judge has allowed the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. and

directed the petitioner to pay the interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/-

per month to each of the respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4 from the date of

filing of the application.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Family Court

without appreciating the material available on record and without

(2 of 2) [CRLMP-4300/2020]

assigning any cogent reason has awarded interim maintenance in

favour of the respondent-wife and sons. Counsel further submits that

the interim maintenance as awarded by the Family Court is on higher

side as the petitioner is not having enough income, therefore the

same may be reduced appropriately.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the

impugned orders passed by the court below.

The impugned orders passed by the learned Court below are an

interim order. The final order on the application is yet to be passed

by the court below. The learned courts below after taking into

consideration all the material available before it, has rightly awarded

interim maintenance of Rs.5,000/- per month in favour of each of the

respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4. The order impugned do not suffer from

any illegality and perversity, hence, no interference is called for from

this Court.

The criminal misc. petition stand disposed of accordingly. The

court below is directed to decide the main application after taking

into consideration all the documents and material aspect of the

matter as well as statements so recorded before it, within a period of

six months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Stay petition also decided accordingly.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 63-Prashant/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter