Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Subhash vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 2156 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2156 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Subhash vs State on 27 January, 2021
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 987/2020

1.     Subhash S/o Shri Valaji Makwana, Aged About 22 Years,
       Village Pondra Fala, Siramhudi, Police Station Kalinjara,
       District Banswara (Raj.). (At Present Lodged At Central
       Jail Udaipur).
2.     Ishwar S/o Shri Rughji Meena, Aged About 22 Years,
       Village Pondra Fala, Siramhudi, Police Station Kalinjara,
       District Banswara (Raj.). (At Present Lodged At Central
       Jail Udaipur).
                                                                 ----Appellants
                                   Versus
State, Through P.p.
                                                                ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. JVS Deora
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr.Sharwan Bishnoi, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

27/01/2021
     In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being

taken while hearing the matters in Court.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.815/2020 filed on behalf of applicant

/ appellant no.1 Subhash.

     Learned counsel for the appellant submits that prosecutrix at

the time of incident was 17 years of age and the present appellant

was 19 years of age.

     Learned counsel for the appellant further submits that

sentence of co-accused Ishwar has already been suspended by

this Hon'ble court vide order dated 05.01.2021.


                    (Downloaded on 28/01/2021 at 09:10:23 PM)
                                             (2 of 3)                       [CRLAS-987/2020]


        Learned counsel for the appellant has taken this Court to the

statement of the PW-5, in which, prosecutrix has admitted that

she was working as a labour in Rajkot for about one month. It is

also contended that prosecutrix was having free access to work

place and her employer then the prosecution story become

doubtful.

        Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application.

        Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court considers it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellant

No.1.


        Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

815/2020 filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered

that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide

judgment dated 28.10.2020 in Sessions Case No.124/2018 (CIS

No.124/2018) against applicant-appellant no.1 Subhash S/o Shri

Valaji Makwana shall remain suspended till final disposal of the

aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this

court on 01.03.2021 and whenever ordered to do so, till the

disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-
        1.   That he will appear before the trial Court in the

             month of January of every year till the appeal is

             decided.


        2.   That   if    the     appellant        changes           the   place   of

             residence, he will give in writing his changed

             address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

                         (Downloaded on 28/01/2021 at 09:10:23 PM)
                                                                               (3 of 3)                 [CRLAS-987/2020]


                                              in the High Court.


                                        3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

                                              they will give in writing their changed address to

                                              the trial Court.


                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                     (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

78-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter