Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yusuf vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 5578 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 5578 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Yusuf vs State on 25 February, 2021
Bench: Vijay Bishnoi

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2826/2021

1. Yusuf S/o Amin, Aged About 50 Years, B/c Musalman, R/o Ward No. 14, Suratgarh, Dist. Sriganganagar. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Suratgarh).

2. Arvind Singh @ Ravi S/o Bhakhtawar Singh, Aged About 23 Years, B/c Jat Sikh, R/o Alika Dubwali City, District Sirsa, Harayana. (At Present Lodged In District Jail, Suratgarh).

----Petitioners Versus State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suryadeep Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Rajjpurohit, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Judgment / Order

25/02/2021

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned

Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.58/2021 of

Police Station Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar for the offences

punishable under Sections 8/21 NDPS Act. They have preferred

this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he

does not want to press the bail application preferred on behalf of

petitioner No. 1 - Yusuf S/o Amin at this stage, however, seeks

liberty for him to file a fresh bail application before the trial court

after filing of the charge-sheet.

(2 of 2) [CRLMB-2826/2021]

Accordingly, the bail application preferred on behalf of the

petitioner No. 1 - Yusuf S/o Amin is dismissed as not pressed

at this stage with the liberty sought for.

So far as petitioner No.2 - Arvind Singh @ Ravi S/o

Bhakhtawar Singh is concerned, it is submitted that as per the

prosecution story, narcotic contraband smack weighing 75 gms.

alleged to have been recovered in the matter is below commercial

quantity.

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances

of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused

petitioner No.2 - Arvind Singh @ Ravi S/o Bhakhtawar

Singh under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application preferred on behalf of

petitioner No. 2 - Arvind Singh @ Ravi S/o Bhakhtawar

Singh filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed

that he shall be released on bail in connection with FIR

No.58/2021 of Police Station Suratgarh, District Sriganganagar

provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/-

with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the

satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that

court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon

to do so till the completion of the trial.

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

60-pratibha/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter