Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Amar Singh vs Rajasthan Sub-Ordinate And ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 4884 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4884 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Amar Singh vs Rajasthan Sub-Ordinate And ... on 22 February, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 345/2021

Amar Singh S/o Shri Prahalad Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o 146, Akhawato Ki Vas, Village Kharabera Purohitan, District Jodhpur, Rajasthan.

----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Sub-Ordinate And Ministerial Service Selection Board, Jaipur Through Its Secretary.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. VLS Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vinit Sanadhaya

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Judgment

22/02/2021

1. The petitioner vied for the post of Librarian Grade-III in

furtherance of the recruitment notification dated 21.5.2018. The

said recruitment was however, kept in abeyance and

fresh/amended notification dated 1.11.2019 came to be issued,

vide which, applications were again invited from eligible

candidates.

2. As per the amended recruitment notification, the applicants

were required to furnish their application forms from 2.11.2019 to

1.12.2019.

3. The petitioner submitted his application form on 8.11.2019,

however, under the category of 'unreserved'.

(2 of 3) [CW-345/2021]

4. The petitioner's father, who was in Government service, got

superannuated on 30.11.2019, whereafter, he secured the

certificate of EWS on 28.12.2020.

5. The petitioner has prayed that his candidature be considered

under EWS category on the basis of certificate dated 28.12.2020.

6. Mr. Sanadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the

respondent-Selection Board submitted that indisputably, on the

date of submitting application form, viz., on 8.11.2019 and even

on the last date of submitting application form (1.12.2019), the

petitioner did not have EWS certificate with him. He added that

even when result of the written examination was declared (on

11.11.2020), petitioner did not have EWS certificate and same

came to be issued on 28.12.2020. He, thus, submitted that

petitioner's candidature cannot be considered under the EWS

category.

7. Heard.

8. Concededly, on the date of submitting application form (on

8.11.2019) neither the petitioner had with him EWS certificate nor

could he claim to be falling under such category, as his father was

very much in Government service.

9. It is settled proposition of law that candidature of a

candidate is required to be reckoned on the date of submitting

application form or maximum till the last date of submitting

application form. Admittedly, till 2.12.2020, the petitioner did not

have EWS certificate with him and the same came to be issued in

his favour on 28.12.2020, much after the result of written

examination was declared.

(3 of 3) [CW-345/2021]

10. Such being the position, this Court does not find any merit

and substance in the present writ petition, for which it is hereby

dismissed.

11. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

22-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter