Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4792 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 February, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 14120/2020
Vikram Bhati S/o Madan Singh Bhati, Aged About 25 Years, By Caste Mali, R/o Rai Ka Bera, Magra Punjla, Mandore, Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent CONNECTED WITH S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 13124/2020 Hem Singh S/o Shri Kheta Ram, Aged About 25 Years, R?o Parihar Nagar, Bhadwasiya, Jodhpur.
(At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vinod Sharma
Mr. Ravindra Acharya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.R. Choudhary, P.P.
For Complainant(s) : Mr. Harshad Bhadu
Present in person : Mr. Suresh Soni, C.I.,
SHO, PS Madore, Jodhpur
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
19/02/2021
Pursuant to the direction given by a Coordinate Bench of this
Court on 07.12.2020, Investigating Officer Mr. Suresh Soni, CI,
SHO, Police Station Mandore, District Jodhpur is present in person
before this Court.
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-14120/2020]
Heard learned counsels for the parties and also perused the
material on record.
The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.134/2020 of
Police Station Mandore, District Jodhpur for the offence punishable
under Section 302/120-B IPC. They have preferred these bail
applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
Learned counsels for the petitioners have submitted that
from a bare perusal of the charge-sheet, it is clear that only
allegation against the petitioners is to the effect that they
conducted recce of the deceased and informed the co-accused
persons, who were present at the place of incident and fired
gunshot. Learned counsels for the petitioners have submitted that
the petitioners had no knowledge that the co-accused would kill
the deceased. It is further submitted that the petitioners had no
motive to kill the deceased. It is also submitted that the charge-
sheet has been filed and the trial of the case will take time.
Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the
complainant have vehemently opposed the bail applications and
argued that from the call details and other evidence collected by
the police during the course of investigation, it is clear that the
petitioners were in contact with the co-accused persons, who
committed murder of the deceased by firing gunshot and they
were the petitioners who gave information about the presence of
the deceased in the market and on the basis of their information
the co-accused persons reached the place of incident and
committed brutal murder of the deceased. It is, therefore,
submitted that the involvement of the petitioners in commission of
crime is writ large and they are not entitled to be enlarged on bail.
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-14120/2020]
Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances
of the case and after perusing the charge-sheet, without
expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just
and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section
439 Cr.P.C.
Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439
Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners - Vikram
Bhati S/o Madan Singh Bhati and Hem Singh S/o Shri Kheta Ram
shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.134/2020 of
Police Station Mandore, District Jodhpur provided each of them
executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound
and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of
learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each
and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till
the completion of the trial.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
Abhishek Kumar S.Nos.7-8
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!