Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chhaganlal vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 3219 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3219 Raj
Judgement Date : 5 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Chhaganlal vs State on 5 February, 2021
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
    S.B. Criminal Suspension Of Sentence/ Bail No. 770/2020

                                       in

                S.B. Criminal Appeal No.890/2020

Chhaganlal S/o Sh. Okaram, Aged About 29 Years, By Caste
Bhatt, R/o Subhash Nagar, P.s. Industrial Area, Dist. Pali,
Rajasthan. (At Present Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur).
                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State, Through Pp
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. B.S. Rathore
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Vikram Sharma PP for the State.



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                    Order

05/02/2021

     In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being

taken while hearing the matters in Court.

     This Court heard learned counsel for the parties as well as

perused the material available on record.

     Learned counsel for the applicant-appellant submits that the

applicant-appellant is the husband of the prosecutrix. Learned

counsel has drawn the attention of this Court towards the

statements of PW-4 and PW-10. Learned counsel further submits

that the allegation against the husband (applicant-appellant) is

that he abetted the commission of rape. Learned counsel also

submits that the applicant-appellant was on bail during trial.

     Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application.



                    (Downloaded on 05/02/2021 at 09:32:30 PM)
                                            (2 of 3)                      [SOSA-770/2020]



     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case and looking into the fact that the applicant-appellant was

on bail during trial,      this Court considers it just and proper to

suspend the substantive sentence awarded to the accused

applicant-appellant.

     Accordingly, the present suspension of sentence application

filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide judgment

dated 18.09.2020 in CIS No.29/2019 against applicant-appellant

Chhaganlal S/o Sh. Okaram shall remain suspended till final

disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided he executes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his

appearance in this court on 09.03.2021 and whenever ordered to

do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated

below:-
     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the appeal is

           decided.


     2.    That   if    the     appellant        changes           the   place   of

           residence, he will give in writing his changed

           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

           in the High Court.


     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

           they will give in writing their changed address to

           the trial Court.

     The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                       (Downloaded on 05/02/2021 at 09:32:30 PM)
                                                                                (3 of 3)                [SOSA-770/2020]


                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.


                                                                     (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

54-SKant/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter