Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jitendra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 2991 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2991 Raj
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Jitendra Singh vs State Of Rajasthan on 3 February, 2021
Bench: Devendra Kachhawaha

(1 of 4) [CRLMB-217/2021]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 217/2021

Jitendra Singh S/o Pritam Singh, Aged 39 Years, By Caste Sikh,

R/o Plot No. 65, Vyas Colony, Air Force Ratanada, At Present Plot

No. 112/5B, Kudi Bhagatasani Housing Board, Jodhpur.

(Accused Lodged In Central Jail Jodhpur).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14496/2020 Harimangal Singh S/o Sh. Ramsingh, Aged About 45 Years, R/o

Village Korari, P.s. Nawabganj, Prayagraj Allahabad (Uttar

Pradesh).

----Petitioner Versus State, Through Pp

----Respondent S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 218/2021 Vinay Kumar Goutam S/o Shri Kishanlal, Age 31 Years, R/o

356/340/881, Ashok Vihar, Aalam Nagar, Police Thana Tal Katora,

District Lucknow, Uttrapradesh.

(At Present Lodged In District Jail Jodhpur).

----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary Mr. D.R. Bishnoi Mr. C.S. Rajpurohit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP

(2 of 4) [CRLMB-217/2021]

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Judgment / Order

03/02/2021

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 217/2021

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 218/2021

The present bail applications have been filed under Section

439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners, who are in judicial custody

in connection with F.I.R. No.287/2020, Police Station Shastri

Nagar, District Jodhpur, registered for the offences under Sections

406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard and considered the arguments advanced by the

learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor.

Perused the material available on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioners stated that offences are

triable by Magistrate; the benefit of bail has already been granted

by the coordinate Bench of this Court to the main accused person,

namely, Irshad Ali vide order dated 01.02.2021 (Bail Application

No.1215/2021); further investigation and trial will take time. With

these submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that

the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor stated that laptop and

printer was recovered from Jitendra and Rs.25,000/- were

recovered from accused Vinay Kumar. He further stated that

Irshad Ali is not main accused, Pramod and Harimangal are the

(3 of 4) [CRLMB-217/2021]

main accused. Therefore, benefit of bail may not be granted to

accused-petitioners.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,

particularly to the fact that offences are triable by Magistrate and

the benefit of bail has already been granted to the co-accused,

and further investigation and trial will take sufficiently long time,

therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits

of the case, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application

filed by the petitioners deserves to be accepted.

Consequently, the bail applications are allowed. It is directed

that the accused-petitioners No.1. - Jitendra Singh S/o Pritam

Singh, 2. Vinay Kumar Goutam S/o Shri Kishanlal, arrested in

connection with F.I.R. No.287/2020, Police Station Shastri Nagar,

District Jodhpur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any

other case; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of

Rs.50,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs.25,000/- (out of which

one surety shall be a local surety) each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court

on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14496/2020

Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the

present anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438

Cr.P.C., at this stage and stated that petitioner is ready to

surrender within 07 days before the concerned learned trial Court

and requested that if petitioner filed regular bail application before

the concerned trial Court, the concerned trial Court may consider

(4 of 4) [CRLMB-217/2021]

and decide the bail application of the petitioner preferably on the

same day as per law.

Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is

dismissed as not pressed. However, if accused-petitioner

Harimangal Singh S/o Sh. Ramsingh, surrenders in connection

with FIR No.287/2020, Police Station Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur City

West, before the learned trial Court within 07 days from today and

if he files regular bail application, after his surrender, before the

concerned trial Court, the trial Court is directed to consider and

decide his bail application preferably on the very same day in

accordance with law.

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

29-31/amit/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter