Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalu Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 2789 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2789 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Kalu Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 2 February, 2021

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2336/2020

1. Kalu Singh S/o Birbal Singh, Aged About 22 Years,

2. Shankar Ram S/o Lisu Ram, Aged About 22 Years,

3. Haru Ram S/o Devi Lal, Aged About 21 Years,

4. Chagna Ram S/o Sona Ram, Aged About 35 Years,

5. Arjun Singh S/o Sag Singh, Aged About 19 Years,

6. Nirmit S/o Ram Swaroop, Aged About 30 Years,

7. Gudi W/o Hukma Ram, Aged About 25 Years,

8. Vedi Singh S/o Lekhu Singh, Aged About 35 Years,

9. Bajrang Singh S/o Birbal Singh, Aged About 23 Years,

10. Muna Devi W/o Devi Lal, Aged About 48 Years,

11. Manju D/o Devi Lal, Aged About 20 Years,

12. Ranjeet Singh S/o Lekhu Singh, Aged About 50 Years,

13. Gattu Singh S/o Chetan Singh, Aged About 30 Years,

14. Ramesh Singh S/o Sag Singh, Aged About 21 Years,

15. Angrej Ram S/o Lisu Ram, Aged About 27 Years,

16. Naresh S/o Oma Ram, Aged About 21 Years,

17. Rajendra S/o Leesu Ram, Aged About 30 Years,

18. Vimla W/o Dilipa Ram, Aged About 30 Years,

19. Geeta D/o Devi Lal, Aged About 19 Years,

20. Suman D/o Devi Lal, Aged About 21 Years,

21. Gemra Ram S/o Hukma Ram, Aged About 35 Years,

22. Birju Ram S/o Lisu Ram, Aged About 29 Years,

23. Sadul Ram S/o Lisu Ram, Aged About 25 Years,

24. Lisu Ram S/o Naru Ram, Aged About 52 Years,

25. Imali W/o Om Prakash, Aged About 42 Years,

26. Jagdish S/o Khamana Ram, Aged About 21 Years,

27. Pappu Ram S/o Khamana Ram, Aged About 27 Years, All By Caste Oad, Resident Of Village Babar Magra, Tehsil Nachana, District Jaisalmer.

----Petitioners Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Revenue (Colonization) Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

(2 of 2) [CW-2336/2020]

2. The Commissioner, Colonization Department, Bikaner.

3. The Addl. Commissioner (Colonization) (Administration), I.G.N.P. Jaisalmer, District Jaisalmer.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. NS Rajpurhoit, Adv.

For Respondent(s) :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

Judgment / Order

02/02/2021 A limited prayer has been made by the counsel for the

petitioners that the petitioners may be permitted to file a fresh

representation ventilating their grievances before the respondent

No.3--Addl. Commissioner (Colonization) [Administration], IGNP

Jaisalmer, District Jaisalmer and the respondent No.3 may be

directed to decide the said representation at an early date.

In view of limited prayer made, the present writ petition is

disposed of with the direction to the respondent No.3--Addl.

Commissioner (Colonization) [Administration], IGNP Jaisalmer,

District Jaisalmer that if the petitioners file a fresh representation

ventilating their grievances before him within a period of fifteen

days from today, then he shall consider and decide the same in

accordance with law within a period of three months from the date

of its receipt.

Stay application is also decided.

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J 80-MS/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter