Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 2772 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2772 Raj
Judgement Date : 2 February, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Dinesh Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 2 February, 2021
     HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                      JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1105/2020

1.     Dinesh Kumar S/o Sh. Tulsi Ram, Aged About 54 Years,
       R/o Jangiwada, Pali, District Pali.
2.     Kanti Lal S/o Sh. Tulsi Ram, Aged About 23 Years, R/o
       Jangiwada, Pali, District Pali.
3.     Mahendra Kumar S/o Tulsi Ram, Aged About 25 Years,
       R/o Jangiwada, Pali, District Pali.
4.     Ashok    S/o     Tulsi     Ram,       Aged      About      40   Years,   R/o
       Jangiwada, Pali, District Pali.
                                                                   ----Appellants
                                     Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
                                                                  ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)           :     Mr. Kaushal Sharma
For Respondent(s)          :     Mr. Vikram Sharma, PP



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

                                      Order

02/02/2021
     In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being

taken while hearing the matters in Court.

     Admit.

     Issue notice.


     Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of the

State. Hence, notice need not be issued.


     Call for the record.

     Heard learned counsel for the parties on S.B. Suspension

of Sentence (Appeal) No.885/2020.




                      (Downloaded on 03/02/2021 at 09:00:32 PM)
                                         (2 of 3)                         [CRLAS-1105/2020]


     The sentence of the appellants have been suspended by

learned court below temporarily.


     Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the application.

     Having considered the totality of facts and circumstances of

the case, this Court considers it just and proper to suspend the

substantive sentence awarded to the accused applicant-appellants.

     Accordingly, S.B. Suspension of Sentence (Appeal) No.

885/2020 filed under Sec.389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered

that the substantive sentence passed by the trial court vide

judgment dated 02.12.2020                 in Sessions              Case    No.254/2015

against applicant-appellants (1) Dinesh Kumar S/o Sh. Tulsi

Ram, (2) Kanti Lal S/o Sh. Tulsi Ram, (3) Mahendra Kumar

S/o Tulsi Ram and (4) Ashok S/o Tulsi Ram,                                  shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal, provided each

of them execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with

two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned

trial Judge for their appearance in this court on 02.03.2021 and

whenever ordered to do so, till the disposal of the appeal on the

conditions indicated below:-
     1.    That he will appear before the trial Court in the

           month of January of every year till the appeal is

           decided.


     2.    That   if    the     appellant        changes           the    place   of

           residence, he will give in writing his changed

           address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel

           in the High Court.


     3.    Similarly, if the sureties change their address,

           they will give in writing their changed address to

                       (Downloaded on 03/02/2021 at 09:00:32 PM)
                                                                             (3 of 3)                   [CRLAS-1105/2020]


                                              the trial Court.


                                        The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

                                   the accused-appellant in a separate file. Such file be registered as

                                   Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

                                   appellant was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

                                   be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

                                   not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

                                   pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

                                   accused-appellant does not appear before the trial court, the

                                   learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

                                   cancellation of bail.

                                                                     (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J.

125-Sudheer/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter