Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 7090 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence App. No. 319/2021
IN
S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 1192/2021
1. Suresh Kumar Son Of Raghuveer Singh, Resident Of
Kaadma, Police Station Badhda, District Bhiwani Haryana
(At Present In District Jail, Jhunjhunu)
2. Azad Singh Son Of Mahipal, Resident Of Kaadma, Police
Station Badhda, District Bhiwani Haryana (At Present In
District Jail, Jhunjhunu)
----Petitioners
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajanad Yadav
Mr. Subhash Sharma
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhawani Shankar Sharma, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR VYAS
Order
01/12/2021
1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.
2. The petitioners have filed the revision petition along
with application for suspension of sentence.
3. The revision petition has been preferred against the
judgment dated 23.10.2021 passed by court of the Additional
Session Judge, Khetri, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (the Appellate
Court) in Criminal Regular Appeal No. 16/2016, CIS No. Cr. Appeal
16/2016 affirming the order dated 02.03.2016 passed by court of
(2 of 3) [CRLR-1192/2021]
Judicial Magistrate, Buhana, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (the trial
court) in Regular Criminal Case No. 1372/2014 by which the
petitioners have been convicted for offence/s under Sections 457,
380 read with Section 34 of IPC and sentenced to maximum term
of three years imprisonment.
4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the
petitioners that petitioners have been sentenced to maximum
term of three years imprisonment for offence/s under Sections
457 and 380/34 IPC. As per certificate under Rule 311(3) of
Rajasthan High Court Rules, petitioners were on bail during trial as
well as during pendency of the appeal. At present, they are
confined in jail since 23.10.2021. Hearing of the appeal may take
long time.
5. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application
for suspension of sentence.
6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and scanned the
evidence available on record.
7. Taking into consideration the submissions of learned
counsel for the parties, evidence available on record and overall
facts and circumstances of the case but without commenting upon
merits of the case, this Court deems just and proper to allow the
application for suspension of sentence.
8. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence
is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence awarded to accused-
petitioners 1. Suresh Kumar Son Of Raghuveer Singh and 2. Azad
Singh Son Of Mahipal, shall remain suspended till disposal of this
revision petition and they shall be released on bail provided each
(3 of 3) [CRLR-1192/2021]
of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- (One Lakh)
and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- (Fifty Thousand) each to the
satisfaction of the learned trial Court for their appearance in this
Court on 04.01.2022 and as and when called upon to do so.
(MANOJ KUMAR VYAS),J
Pooja /43
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!