Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Yogesh Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 19222 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 19222 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Yogesh Sharma vs State Of Rajasthan on 16 December, 2021
Bench: Devendra Kachhawaha

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 763/2021 In S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1138/2021

Yogesh Sharma S/o Vijendra Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, Adampur Samlisehar, Police Station Bhorakala, District Muzafarpur At Present at Jawalapur Dhirvali B.H.I., Haridwar (Utrakhand).

(At Present Lodged at Central Jail, Udaipur).

                                                                  ----Petitioner
                                   Versus
State of Rajasthan through PP
                                                                ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)        :     Mr. R.K. Charan
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Order

16/12/2021

This present application for suspension of sentences under

Section 389 CrPC has been preferred on behalf of the appellant-

applicant Yogesh Sharma, who has been convicted and sentenced

of five years R.I. & a Fine of ₹40,000/- & in default of payment of

fine to further undergo six months R.I., by the learned Special

Judge, NDPS Act Cases No.2, Chittorgarh vide judgment dated

16.11.2021 passed in Sessions Case No.190/2014.

Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant-applicant

and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available

on record.

Learned Public Prosecutor does not wish to file reply to the

application filed for suspension of sentence.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-763/2021]

Arguing on the application for suspension of sentences, it is

submitted by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant that as

per the prosecution, alleged contraband poppy-straw weighing 40

kgs. recovered in this case which is below commercial quantity;

appellant has been convicted by learned court below for the

offence under Section 8/15 of the NDPS Act and sentenced him for

five years R.I. and a fine ₹40,000/- & in default of payment of fine

to further undergo six months R.I.; during trial, applicant-

appellant was on bail. Lastly, learned counsel appearing for the

applicant-appellant has submitted that hearing of the appeal is

likely to take time.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application

for suspension of sentences of the applicant-appellant.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case,

particularly to the facts that recovered quantity of the alleged

contraband is below commercial quantity; during trial, accused

applicant-appellant was on bail and that hearing of the appeal is

likely to take time in near future, therefore, without expressing

any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is

inclined to suspend the sentences awarded to the applicant-

appellant.

Accordingly, the instant application for suspension of

sentences filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentences passed by learned Special Judge,

NDPS Act Cases No.2, Chittorgarh vide judgment dated

16.11.2021 passed in Sessions Case No.190/2014 against the

appellant-applicant - Yogesh Sharma S/o Vijendra Sharma

shall remain suspend till the final disposal of the aforesaid appeal

and he shall be released on bail subject to the condition that he

(3 of 3) [SOSA-763/2021]

shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of ₹1,00,000/- with two

sound and solvent sureties (out of which one surety shall be a

local/close relative) of ₹50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the

learned trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on 17.01.2022

and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on

the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered

as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the

accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this

order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal

Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose

relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In

case, the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the

trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the

High Court for cancellation of bail.

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

69-Arvind/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter