Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Shyamu vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 18898 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18898 Raj
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Shyamu vs State on 13 December, 2021
Bench: Rameshwar Vyas

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S. B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 826/2021

Shyamu S/o Satpal Singh, aged about 28 years, B/c Rajput, R/o C- 136, Street No. 20, Khajuri Khas, Presently C-1/165, Street No. 21, Khajuri Khas, Delhi (Presently lodged at Central Jail, Bikaner)

----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Dr. R.D.S.S. Kharlia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shrawan Kumar Bishnoi, P.P.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS

Order

13/12/2021

The petitioner has been convicted and sentenced as below

vide Judgment dated 20.01.2017 passed by Additional Sessions

Judge, Bhadra, District Hanumangarh in Sessions Case

No. 20/2016 (14/2014) (C.I.S. No. 20/2016) :-

Offence              Sentences               Fine                    Fine   Default
                                                                     sentences
u/s  8/20          of 20 years RI            Rs.2,00,000/-           3 years SI
NDPS Act

The petitioner has moved this application under Section 389

Cr.P.C. seeking suspension of sentences awarded to him by the

trial court.

Learned Public Prosecutor has not chosen to file reply to the

application for suspension of sentences and proposes to argue the

matter orally.

(2 of 3) [SOSA-826/2021]

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public

Prosecutor and perused impugned judgment and original record of

the case.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has served more than 8 years and 2 months sentence awarded to

him by the trial court. He further submits that no other case

under the N.D.P.S. Act is pending against the petitioner. He is not

a previous convict. He further submits that the appeal is of the

year 2017. The hearing of the appeal is not likely in near future.

In the above circumstances, he prays to allow this application for

suspension of sentences and release the petitioner on bail.

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed

the application for suspension of sentences.

Having regard to the rival submissions and after perusal of

the record as also considering the facts and circumstances of the

case more particularly looking to the period of sentence already

served by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to accept the

application for suspension of sentences and to release the

petitioner on bail during the pendency of the appeal.

Accordingly, this application for suspension of sentence filed

under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is ordered that the

sentences passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhadra,

District Hanumangarh vide Judgment dated 20.01.2017 in

Sessions Case No. 20/2016 (14/2014) (C.I.S. No. 20/2016)

against the petitioner - Shyamu S/o Satpal Singh, shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he shall be

released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in the sum

of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the

(3 of 3) [SOSA-826/2021]

satisfaction of the trial Judge for his appearance in this Court on

27.01.2022 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the

appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the petitioner changes the place of residence, he will give in writing his changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the

accused-petitioner in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

petitioner was tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused petitioner does not appear before the trial court, the trial

Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of

bail.

(RAMESHWAR VYAS),J

36-Inder/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter