Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mahipal Singh vs State
2021 Latest Caselaw 18830 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 18830 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 December, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Mahipal Singh vs State on 10 December, 2021
Bench: Devendra Kachhawaha

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1214/2021

1. Mahipal Singh S/o Dalpat Singh, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Maanpura Mandvara Police Station Barlut Dist. Sirohi.

2. Dalveersingh S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Sadar Bazar, Javal, Then Assistant Veterinary Valdara Police Station Kalandri Dist. Sirohi.

----Appellants Versus

1. State of Rajasthan through PP

2. Omprakash S/o Moolchand, Ambedkar Nagar Tonk, P.S. Kotwali Tonk, Dist. Tonk, Currently Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Sirohi.

                                                                ----Respondents


For Appellant(s)         :     Mr. Abhishek Mehta
For Respondent(s)        :     Mr. Mukhtiyar Khan, PP



HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA

Order

10/12/2021

Heard.

Admit. Issue notice.

Learned Public Prosecutor puts in appearance on behalf of

the respondent No.1-State of Rajasthan. Thus, let the notices be

issued to the respondent No.2 only.

Call for the record.

Heard learned counsel for the appellants-applicants as well

as learned Public Prosecutor on application (No.817/2021) seeking

suspension of sentences.

(2 of 4) [CRLAS-1214/2021]

By the instant application preferred under Section 389

Cr.P.C., applicants-appellants have craved for suspending the

sentences handed down by learned Special Judge, SC/ST,

(Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sirohi (for short, 'learned trial

Court'), by its verdict dated 18.11.2021 in Special Case

No.102/2019, arising out of CR No.238/2020. Learned trial Court,

by the aforesaid verdict, convicted the applicants-appellants for

offences punishable under Sections 332/34 of the Indian Penal

Code read with Section 3(2)(va) of SC/ST (Prevention of

Atrocities) Act and 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section

3(1)(r)(s) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

Arguing on the application for suspension of sentences, it is

submitted by learned counsel that during the trial, applicants-

appellants have been enlarged on bail; applicants-appellants have

been handed down a short sentence of two years' Simple

Imprisonment; the sentences awarded to the applicants-

appellants have already been suspended by learned trial Court till

16.12.2021; and final decision of the appeal is likely to take

considerable time, therefore it would not be appropriate to keep

applicants-appellants under further incarceration.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the

application for suspension of sentences of the applicants-

appellants.

Although, as per arguments, applicants-appellants have been

handed down a short sentence of two years' Simple

Imprisonment; and trial will take sufficiently long time, therefore,

(3 of 4) [CRLAS-1214/2021]

I feel inclined to accept this application for suspension of

sentence.

Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence

(No.817/2021) filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is

ordered that the sentences passed by learned Special Judge,

SC/ST, (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Sirohi, vide judgment

dated 18.11.2021, in Special Case No.102/2019, arising out of CR

No.238/2020 against appellants-applicants, Mahipal Singh S/o

Dalpat Singh and Dalveersingh S/o Mohan Singh, shall remain

suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and they shall

be released on bail, provided each of them execute a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/-

each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their

appearance in this Court on 11.01.2022 and whenever ordered to

do so till disposal of the appeal, on the conditions indicated

below:-

1. That they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicants change the place of residence, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of

accused-applicants in a separate file. Such file be registered as

Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-

applicants were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also

be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall

(4 of 4) [CRLAS-1214/2021]

not be taken into account for statistical purposes relating to

pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said

accused applicants do not appear before the trial court, the

learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for

cancellation of bail.

(DEVENDRA KACHHAWAHA),J

2-Rashi/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter