Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Pramod Kumar S/O Sitaram vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 3535 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3535 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Pramod Kumar S/O Sitaram vs State Of Rajasthan on 10 August, 2021
Bench: Pankaj Bhandari
        HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                    BENCH AT JAIPUR
     S.B. Criminal Misc. Suspension of Sentence Application
                              No.1121/2020
                                       IN

              S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 1639/2020

Pramod Kumar S/o Sitaram, R/o Balodi, Chhoti, Police Station
Sadar Fatehpur, Distt. Sikar. (Juvenile Accused Is Lodged In
Juvenile Home Jhunjhunu)
                                                                   ----Appellant
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
                                                                 ----Respondent
For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. Anil Mahala
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Mangal Singh Saini, PP



           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

                          Judgment / Order

10/08/2021

1. Heard on application for suspension of sentence.

2. It is contended by counsel for the appellant that at the time

of the alleged incident, appellant was aged seventeen and a half

years. It is also contended that different dates of birth are

mentioned with regard to the prosecutrix. As per the Primary

School record, she was more than sixteen years. As per the school

record, her age is more than fourteen years. It is further

contended that appellant was on bail during trial. He has remained

in custody for a period of nineteen months. There is delay in

lodging of F.I.R.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application for

(2 of 2) [SOSA-1121/2020]

suspension of sentence. It is contended that prosecutrix was gang

raped and in her Court statement she has specifically levelled

allegation with regard to rape against the present appellant.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. Considering the fact that F.I.R. was lodged by the brother of

the victim, who has stated that prosecutrix was hospitalized in a

shabby condition, after she recovered consciousness, she narrated

the incident, that in her medical report, hymen was found torn.

From the statement of prosecutrix who admittedly is a child, there

is specific allegation of rape against the present appellant and

there being allegation of gang rape, I am not inclined to entertain

the application for suspension of sentence.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence is

dismissed.

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

ARTI SHARMA /22

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter