Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3365 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3860/2021
Maliram S/o Mahadevaram & Anr.
----Petitioners
Versus
Banwarilal S/o Late Shri Bhuraram & Ors.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Saini Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav for
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
Judgment / Order
02/08/2021
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the
Khatauni of Village Gudha, Tehsil Udaipur, District-Jhunjhunu for
Samvat 2028-2031, khasra Nos.856, 864 & 865 have been shown
to be in favour of Bhanwar Singh, Chhotu Singh and widow of
Maan Singh khasra No.864 gair mumkin chah.
However, the SDO as well as the revenue court have treated
the same to be in favour of the respondents without there being
any documentary proof merely because the respondents were
having land adjacent to the well gair mumkin chah. It cannot be
said that the well is in possession of the respondents and the
revenue court could not have passed an order of such a nature.
Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 &
5 submits that they have used the well and as per the revenue
map also, the well is adjacent to their lands and has no connection
with that of the petitioners.
(2 of 2) [CW-3860/2021]
Admit.
Issue notice of the writ petition as well as stay application to
the respondent No.4.
Taking into consideration aforesaid, the effect and operation
of orders passed by the revenue court as well as the SDO court
shall remain stayed till disposal of the writ petition.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J
SAURABH YADAV /670/3
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!