Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Maliram S/O Mahadevaram vs Banwarilal S/O Late Shri Bhuraram
2021 Latest Caselaw 3365 Raj/2

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3365 Raj/2
Judgement Date : 2 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court
Maliram S/O Mahadevaram vs Banwarilal S/O Late Shri Bhuraram on 2 August, 2021
Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma
       HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
                   BENCH AT JAIPUR

               S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3860/2021

Maliram S/o Mahadevaram & Anr.
                                                                  ----Petitioners
                                   Versus
Banwarilal S/o Late Shri Bhuraram & Ors.
                                                                ----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajay Singh Poonia For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Saini Mr. Rajendra Prasad Yadav for

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA

Judgment / Order

02/08/2021

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per the

Khatauni of Village Gudha, Tehsil Udaipur, District-Jhunjhunu for

Samvat 2028-2031, khasra Nos.856, 864 & 865 have been shown

to be in favour of Bhanwar Singh, Chhotu Singh and widow of

Maan Singh khasra No.864 gair mumkin chah.

However, the SDO as well as the revenue court have treated

the same to be in favour of the respondents without there being

any documentary proof merely because the respondents were

having land adjacent to the well gair mumkin chah. It cannot be

said that the well is in possession of the respondents and the

revenue court could not have passed an order of such a nature.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 &

5 submits that they have used the well and as per the revenue

map also, the well is adjacent to their lands and has no connection

with that of the petitioners.

                                                               (2 of 2)                                [CW-3860/2021]



                                         Admit.

Issue notice of the writ petition as well as stay application to

the respondent No.4.

Taking into consideration aforesaid, the effect and operation

of orders passed by the revenue court as well as the SDO court

shall remain stayed till disposal of the writ petition.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J

SAURABH YADAV /670/3

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter