Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ravindra Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 12554 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 12554 Raj
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Ravindra Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan on 11 August, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10440/2021

1. Ravindra Kumar S/o Birbal Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

2. Shree Chand S/o Shri Jagmal Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

3. Ram Swaroop S/o Shri Sitaram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

4. Mool Chand Meghwal S/o Harji Ram Meghwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

5. Basant Kumar S/o Shri Nathuram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

6. Dheeraj Sharma S/o Shri Rajkumar Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

7. Vikash Khichar S/o Shri Baluram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

8. Rahul Kumar Gehlot S/o Shri Rajendra Kumar Gehlot, Aged About 26 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

9. Pankaj Parihar S/o Shri Gordhan Ram, Aged About 32 Years, R/o At Present Working As Nurse Grade Ii At P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

----Petitioners Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Medical And Health Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Governing Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

3. Additional Governing Joint Secretary, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

4. Secretary, Finance (Budget) Department, Government Of

(2 of 3) [CW-10440/2021]

Rajasthan, Jaipur.

5. Joint Secretary, Finance (Budget) Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

6. Director, (Public Health) Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

7. Additional Director, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

8. Nodal Officer, Mndy, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

9. Nodal Officer, Mnjy, Medical And Health Services, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

10. Rajasthan Medical Services Corporation Limites (Rmsc), Department Of Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur Through Its Managing Director.

11. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bikaner.

12. Principal, P.b.m. Hospital And Medical Collage, Bikaner.

13. Superintendent Of P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

14. Member Secretary, Rajasthan Medical Relief Society, P.b.m. Hospital, Bikaner.

----Respondents

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shree Kant Verma

JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

Order

11/08/2021

1. Petitioners' grievance is that they were working on contract

basis under the respondents, and they are apprehending

disengagement of their services.

2. Mr. Shreekant Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners

submits that the petitioners would feel satisfied if the respondents

are directed to consider their representation (which they would be

filing) in light of the judgment of this Court dated

(3 of 3) [CW-10440/2021]

19.01.2021,passed in Jai Prakash Ganchi & Ors. Vs. State of Raj.

& Ors. (S.B.Civil Writ Petition No.7273/2020) and also in light of

circular dated 02.09.2020.

3. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the

direction to the petitioners to file a representation, while enclosing

photostat copy of the judgment in the case of Jai Prakash Ghanchi

(supra) and photostat copy of the circular dated 02.09.2020 within

a period of four weeks from today.

4. In case, representation is so addressed, the competent

authority shall do the needful, in accordance with law, preferably

within a period of eight weeks from receipt thereof.

5. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioners' grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

6. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J 297-A.Arora/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter