Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Priyanka Solanki vs The State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 9012 Raj

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 9012 Raj
Judgement Date : 7 April, 2021

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Priyanka Solanki vs The State Of Rajasthan on 7 April, 2021
Bench: Dinesh Mehta

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6081/2021

Priyanka Solanki D/o Durga Singh Solanki, Aged About 35 Years, R/o House No. 2F, Puri Enclave, New Akashwani Colony, Kota.

----Petitioner Versus

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Education Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner (Raj.).

3. Joint Director, Secondary Education, Bharatpur Division, Bharatpur.

4. Joint Director, Secondary Education, Kota Division, Kota.

                                                                  ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)          :     Mr. Vikram Singh Bhawla
For Respondent(s)          :



                       JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                  Judgment

07/04/2021


1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

would be satisfied, if an appropriate direction is issued to the

respondents to consider petitioner's representation to be posted at

a nearby place, in accordance with law, where concerned post is

lying vacant.

2. The present writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the

direction to the petitioner to address a fresh representation before

the competent authority pointing out vacant posts within a period

of two weeks alongwith photostat copy of the earlier

representation and certified copy of the order instant.

(2 of 2) [CW-6081/2021]

3. In case, such representation is filed by the petitioner, the

competent authority shall decide the same, in accordance with

law, preferably within a period of six weeks from the receipt

thereof.

4. It is made clear that aforesaid direction to decide the

representation has been issued only with a view to ensure

expeditious redressal of petitioner's grievance. The same may not

be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a

particular manner.

5. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

198-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter