Lilaram Roat vs State Of Rajasthan
2021 Latest Caselaw 8707 Raj

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5612/2021

Lilaram Roat S/o Panna Lal Roat, Aged About 42 Years, Dhani Upali Post Varda Tehsil Sagwada District Dungarpur. (Raj.)

----Petitioner Versus

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Elementary Education, Government Secretary, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

2. Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

3. Director, Elementary Education, Bikaner

4. Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner

5. Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Udaipur Zone Udaipur

6. District Education Officer, Elementary Education, Dungarpur.

7. District Education Officer, Secondary Education, Dungarpur.

                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Ramdev Potalia
For Respondent(s)         :



                      JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA

                                 Judgment

01/04/2021

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking

direction to the respondents to make pay fixation of the petitioner

equal to the similarly situated Teachers having been selected in

the same selection process while stepping up the pay of the

petitioner equal to them and that the petitioner may be granted

benefit of seniority, promotion and other consequential benefits.

(2 of 2) [CW-5612/2021]

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar

nature writ petition filed at Jaipur Bench being Nand Kishore

Sharma & Ors. Vs. The State of Rajasthan & Ors. : S.B. Civil Writs

No.12109/2018, decided on 18.07.2018 on the submissions made

by counsel the respondents have been directed to decide the

representation made by the petitioners therein and, therefore, a

similar direction may be granted in the present case.

In view of the submissions made, the writ petition filed by

the petitioner is disposed of with similar direction as given in the

case of Nand Kishore Sharma (supra), wherein, it was directed

asunder:-

"In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than three months from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order."

The stay application also stands disposed of.

(DINESH MEHTA),J

184-CPGoyal/-

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)