Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Siraj Mia vs State Of Haryana
2026 Latest Caselaw 2649 P&H

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 2649 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Siraj Mia vs State Of Haryana on 18 March, 2026

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH
134
                                        CRM-M-72419-2025 (O&M)
                                        Date of decision: 18.03.2026

Siraj Mia                                                    ...Petitioner(s)

                                    VERSUS

State of Haryana                                              ...Respondent(s)



CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ

Present :-    Mr. G.S. Ghuman, Advocate (through V.C.) and
              Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner(s).

              Mr. Paras Talwar, Sr. DAG Haryana.

                              *****

VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral)

1. This second petition has been filed for grant of regular bail to

the petitioner(s) in case bearing FIR No.57 dated 21.02.2025, registered

under Section(s) 318(4), 319, 336(3), 338, 340 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023 (Section 61(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act added later on and

Sections 336(3), 338 and 340 of BNS deleted, later on) at Police Station

Cyber Crime West, District Gurugram.

2. Briefly summarised, the facts of the present case are that :-

"xxxx the present FIR has been lodged by the

complainant Bani Singh wherein it is mentioned that on

10.12.2024, he received a whatsapp link through unknown

number and join him in a whatsapp group "Profit Explorer T3".

After some they add him on another whatsapp group "Special

Training Team B. They given training for stock trading and

1 of 4

134 CRM-M-72419-2025 (O&M)

IPOs on both whatsapp group. Group admin sharing different

ideas of investment in IPO and stocks. They suggested if he

invest according them than he get 10-20% profile according to

his investment. Many participants sharing their profit on these

groups. So that he realize that he agree to investment. Than

they shared a fake website link which *m.rockscreek.com" and

asked to registered on this website. He registered himself on

this website and login. After login the website shows Indian

stocks and different available IPOs. This website is now

disabled & is not accessible. After that they giving tips for

investment and asked to trade according this website. On 5th

Jan 2025, they provide bank account details and asked to

deposit fund for investment. In starting he deposit 2.99 lakh and

start trading according their advice. After that they suggest to

invest more to gain more profit. He did not understand and he

do payments in different bank accounts till 22nd Jan 2025

which provided by them. After that he trying to withdrawal fund

but withdrawal not processed. Than he asked them for

withdrawal than they told him that due to some technical issue

withdrawal got delayed and the shared him fake/Forged

documents on whatsapp group mentioning name Rockscreek, in

those documents Rockscreek was shown to be registered in

SEBI (stock exchange board of India). So he got convinced,

later on he found that they deleted those documents. Then after

one week he did not get any withdrawal than he again asked

2 of 4

134 CRM-M-72419-2025 (O&M)

them for withdrawal but they removed him from above

whatsapp groups and above fake website got disabled than he

realize that they did scam with him. From 5th Jan 2025 to 22nd

Jan 2025, he transferred Rs 1,94,02.000 /- from his two HDFC

Bank and ICICI Bank account. The details of phone number

and bank accounts are also given. The Fraudsters added him in

rockscreek.com and showed him fake/forged documents to

induce me to transfer earn money. It was requested that legal

action be taken against accused. Upon this statement the

present FIR was lodged".

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that as per the case

set out by the prosecution, the complainant was allured by certain links to

make an investment, being induced by the disclosures made on the said

link/website(s), the complainant transferred a sum of Rs. 1.94 crore

approximately for investment in different accounts. He contends that out of

the aforesaid amount, a sum of Rs.1.07 crore was allegedly transferred to

one Tamim Store. He contends that the Police interrogated the proprietor-

Anarul Islam who disclosed he had sold his account of Tamim Stores to the

petitioner herein. He contends that on interrogation, the petitioner revealed

that he had further sold the account to one Khurshid for certain commission.

He contends that no recovery of any nature whatsoever has been effected

from the petitioner. He contends that the offences are triable by a Magistrate

and that out of 08 prosecution witnesses only 01 has been examined so far

and thus, the trial would take a long time to conclude. He further contends

that the petitioner has been in custody since 10.03.2025. It is also contended

3 of 4

134 CRM-M-72419-2025 (O&M)

that the petitioner has clean antecedents.

4. Learned counsel for respondent-State does not dispute the

aforesaid factual aspects.

5. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and taking into

consideration the facts and circumstances as noted above, including the

period of actual custody already undergone by the petitioner in a

Magisterial trial, the stage of the trial as well as the clean antecedents and

bearing in mind that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a long time, I

deem it fit to allow the instant petition.

6. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed and the petitioner is

ordered to be admitted to regular bail subject to his furnishing bail/surety

bonds to the satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty Magistrate/Illaqa Magistrate

concerned.

7. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not extend any threat

and shall not influence any prosecution witness in any manner directly or

indirectly.

8. The observation made hereinabove shall not be construed as an

expression on the merits of the case and the trial Court shall decide the case

on the basis of available material.





                                                 (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ)
18.03.2026                                               JUDGE
Mangal Singh
         Whether speaking/reasoned :     Yes/No
         Whether reportable        :     Yes/No




                                        4 of 4

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter