Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3467 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2026
CRM-M-14294
14294-2026 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
257+113
CRM-M-14294-2026 (O&M)
Date of decision: 18.04.2026.
SAKATAR SINGH AND OTHERS
....Petitionerss
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
O
....Respondents
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Present: Mr. Rahul Bhargava, Advocate (Through VC)
Ms. Tamana Singla, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Rahul Jindal, AAG, Punjab.
Ms. Komal Preet Kaur, Advocate
for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
*****
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J. (ORAL)
CRM-15032 15032-2026
This is an application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nyaya
Sanhita, 2023 for placing on record amended memo of parties.
The same is allowed as prayed for.
CRM-15033 15033-2026
This is an application under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik
Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 for modification of the head note as well
as prayer clause of the main petition for deletion of Section 365 of IPC.
In view of the reasons mentioned in the applic application, ation, the same
is allowed and the Registry is directed to do the needful.
Application stands disposed of.
authenticity of this document.
CRM-M-14294
MAIN CASE
1. This is second petition filed under Section 528 Bharatiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, 2023 for quashing of FIR No.42, dated
05.03.2023, under Sections 458, 323, 506, 201, 34 IPC, at PS Dhanula,
District Barnala (Annexure P-1) P and subsequent proceedings arising
therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure P P-2).
2. This Court vide order dated 17.03.2026 had directed the
parties to appear before the Illaqa/Duty Magistrate to get their statements
recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the
genuineness of the compromise.
3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the parties have appeared
before Judicial Magistrate First Class, Barnala and got their statements
recorded. On the basis of the statements so recorded, Judicial Magistrate
First Class, Barnala has submitted report dated 04.04.2026 to the effect that
the compromise compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and
without any coercion or undue influence.
4. Learned State counsel as well as counsel for respondent No.2
and 3 have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties.
5. In view of the above, ve, no useful purpose would be served to
continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR.
6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench
judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of
Punjab and another another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and
others (2012) 10 SCC 303, 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No.42, dated
authenticity of this document.
CRM-M-14294
05.03.2023, under Sections 458, 323, 506, 201, 34 IPC, at PS Dhanula,
District Barnala (Annexure P-1) P and subsequent proceedings arising
therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure P P-2) are
quashed.
7. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed
of, accordingly.
(RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL) 18.04.2026 JUDGE Gurpreet
i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No
ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No
authenticity of this document.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!