Thursday, 21, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Brahmjit Singh And Ors vs Haryana State Industrial And ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 17777 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17777 P&H
Judgement Date : 24 September, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Brahmjit Singh And Ors vs Haryana State Industrial And ... on 24 September, 2024

Author: Arun Palli

Bench: Arun Palli

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128463-DB




      IN
       N THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
                     CHANDIGARH

                                              CM
                                              CM-7396-CWP-2022 in/and
                                              CWP
                                              CWP-11981-2021
                                              Date of decision: 24.09.2024.

Brahmjit Singh and others
                                                               ....Petitioners
                                Versus
Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Corporation Limited and
another
                                                     ....Respondents
                             AND
                                              CWP No.5898 of 2023
Narender
                                                    ----Petitioner
                             Versus
State of Haryana and others
                                                    ....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN PALLI
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL

Present:   Mr. Rajinder Singh Malik, Advocate
           for the applicants/petitioners (in CM
                                              CM-7393-CWP-2022 &
           CM
           CM-7396-CWP-2022        in CWP No. 11981 of 2021).

           Mr. Kanwar Abhay Singh, Advocate
           for the petitioner (in CWP No. 5898 of 2023).

           Mr. Ankur Mittal, Addl.AG., Haryana
           and
            nd Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate
           for the respondent-State.

           Mr. Pravindra
                P         Singh Chauhan, Advocate
           for
            or respondent-HSIIDC
               respondent         in CWP-11981
                                          11981-2021.

                 ***

VIKRAM AGGARWAL, AGGARWAL J.

CM-7393-CWP CWP-2022 in CWP No. 11981 of 2021

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is

allowed. Annexure A-1 A is taken on record.



                                    1 of 6

                                   Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128463-DB


CM-7396-CWP-2022 in/and
CWP-11981-2021 and connected matter                                     -2-


CM-7396-CWP-2022 in CWP No. 11981 of 2021

The instant application seeks recalling/modification of the order

dated 07.07.2021 vide which, on a statement having been given by the then

Additional General, Haryana, the writ petition had been disposed of.

It has been averred in the application that the writ petition was

disposed of on a statement given by the respondents that no application had

been invited for allotment of industrial plots under the R&R Policy of the

State of Haryana whereas, subsequent to the disposal of the writ petition,

information sought by the applicants/petitioners under RTI reveals that 2000

applications had been received and were pending with the respondents which

included applications for allotment of industrial plots. The communication

dated 21.09.2021 vide which this information was received has been placed

on record as Annexure A-1. It is under these circumstances that

recalling/modification of the order dated 07.07.2021 is being sought.

The application has been opposed by learned counsel for the

non-applicants/respondents by way of a reply wherein it is maintained that

no applications had been invited for allotment of industrial plots under R&R

Policy of the State of Haryana. It has also been averred that advertisement

for allotment of industrial plots under the R&R Policy dated 09.11.2010 was

published in August 2017 with closing date of 30.09.2017 and, thereafter, in

June 2018 with closing date of 30.09.2018. It has also been averred that

applications from the interested oustees had been received and has been

processed but the petitioners had not applied against the said advertisement.

It has also been averred that after 30.09.2018, no advertisement had been

2 of 6

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128463-DB

CM-7396-CWP-2022 in/and CWP-11981-2021 and connected matter -3-

published for allotment of industrial plots. The dismissal of the application

has accordingly been prayed for.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel representing the respondents fairly submits

that to put at rest all doubts in the minds of the petitioners, it would be

appropriate if the application is allowed, the order dated 07.07.2021 is

recalled and the matter is heard on merits.

For the reasons mentioned in the application and in view of the

statement given by learned counsel for respondents-HSIIDC, the application

is allowed. The order dated 07.07.2021 is recalled and that writ is restored to

its original number.

CWP No.11981 of 2021 & CWP No.5898 of 2023

1. For the issues arising in both the writ petitions are identical and

vide order dated 24.03.2023 passed in CWP No.5898 of 2023, it had been

ordered to be listed along with CWP No.11981 of 2021, the same are being

decided by way of a common judgment/order. The facts are being derived

from CWP No.11981 of 2021.

2. The petitioners pray for the issuance of a writ of certiorari

quashing the order dated 24.03.2021 vide which the request/representation

for allotment of industrial plots at IMT, Kharkhoda, under the R&R Policy

issued by the State of Haryana had been rejected. A mandamus is also

prayed for directing the respondents for allotting industrial plot/s to the

petitioners under the said scheme and Notification dated 09.11.2010

(Annexure P-4).





                                      3 of 6

                                    Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128463-DB


CM-7396-CWP-2022 in/and
CWP-11981-2021 and connected matter                                    -4-


3. The basic case of the petitioners is that they were owners of

land (fully described in the writ petition) which had been acquired by the

respondent-Corporation for development of Industrial Model Township at

Kharkhoda.

4. A notification dated 09.11.2010 (Annexure P-4) was issued by

the Government of Haryana for allotment of industrial sites to the land-

owners. As per Clause 9 of the said notification, where 75% of land holding

of a land owner/ co-sharer measuring 1 acre or above had been acquired

thereby substantially impacting his means of subsistence, developed/

commercial/ industrial sites would be reserved and allotted to such land-

owners as per criteria.

5. It is the further case of the petitioners that though for

residential plots, the date for submission of applications had been extended

but for industrial/commercial plots, the same had not been extended and no

opportunity had been given to the petitioners and other similarly situated

persons to apply for allotment of plots. It is also the grievance of the

petitioners that they had never been informed regarding the said policy by

the concerned office or by way of any public notice and in this regard a

representation dated 25.02.2021 (Annexure P-6) had also been submitted.

Reference has also been made to various communications.

6. It has been averred that on 24.03.2021, the representation had

been rejected on the ground that no applications had been invited for

allotment of industrial plots under the R&R Policy and that under the

circumstances, the request/representation (Annexures P-12 to P-14) of the

4 of 6

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128463-DB

CM-7396-CWP-2022 in/and CWP-11981-2021 and connected matter -5-

petitioners could not be accepted. It is under these circumstances, that the

instant writ petitions have been preferred.

7. We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

8. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submit that the

petitioners being land-owners, whose land had been acquired for the

development of IMT, Kharkhoda deserve to be allotted industrial plots under

the R&R Policy (Annexure P-4). Learned counsel submits that upon

information having been obtained under the Right to Information Act, it has

been revealed that about 2000 applications are already pending with the

respondents and that the petitioners should also be permitted to apply for the

allotment of industrial plots.

9. Per contra, learned counsel representing the respondents-

HSIIDC submits that an advertisement had been issued on 13.06.2018 for

which the last date for submission of the applications was 30.09.2018 and

in-fact even prior thereto, advertisement had been issued in August, 2017

wherein the last date for submission of applications was 30.09.2017. He

further submits that thereafter, no advertisement was issued qua industrial

plots and in the year 2021, an advertisement was issued only qua residential

plots. He further submits that an advertisement for allotment of industrial

plots under the R&R Policy is likely to be issued in the coming months and

that it would be open for the petitioners to apply under the said

advertisement and upon applications being received, the claims of all

applicants shall be considered as per their eligibility and as per the terms and

conditions of the policy. He submits that even if certain applications are

pending with the respondents, the same are pursuant to the advertisements

5 of 6

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:128463-DB

CM-7396-CWP-2022 in/and CWP-11981-2021 and connected matter -6-

issued in the year 2017 and 2018 where after no fresh advertisement has

been issued and, therefore, the statement made by the State counsel on

07.07.2021 was not erroneous.

10. Learned counsel for the petitioners are in agreement with the

statement given by learned counsel representing the respondents that the

petitioners can move their applications as and when an advertisement is

issued and their claims shall be considered as per their eligibility and as per

the terms and conditions of the Policy.

11. Learned counsel for the parties are, therefore, are ad idem that

the writ petitions be disposed of in terms of the statements made by learned

counsel for the parties in Court. Ordered accordingly.

This Court is sanguine that the respondents, in terms of the

statement made in court today shall issue an advertisement as expeditiously

as possible for allotment of industrial/commercial plots under the R&R

Policy and shall deal with the claims of all applicants in accordance with

law.

  (ARUN PALLI)                                    (VIKRAM AGGARWAL)
     JUDGE                                              JUDGE



September 24, 2024
Rekha


              Whether speaking/reasoned              Yes/No
              Whether reportable                     Yes/No




                                      6 of 6

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter