Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 17549 P&H
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:124849
CWP-2840-2000 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(205) CWP-2840-2000
Date of Decision : September 20, 2024
Tarsem Lal .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others .. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Ms. Alka Chatrath, Advocate, with
Mr. Nikhil Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Charan Preet Singh, Assistant Advocate General, Punjab.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance
raised in the present writ petition has already been decided while passing
order in CWP No.18574 of 2011 titled as Tarsem Singh and others vs.
State of Punjab and others, decided on 29.07.2024 wherein, it has already
been held that the employees, who were appointed prior to 19.02.1979 and
enhanced their qualification prior to the said date, are entitled for the benefit
of advance increment and in the present case, the petitioner was appointed
prior to the year 1974 as JBT Teacher and had enhanced his qualification
prior to 19.02.1979 hence, the claim of the petitioner is covered by the
judgment passed by this Court and the present writ petition be disposed of
in terms of the decision in Tarsem Singh's case (supra).
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:124849
2. Learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to rebut
the said fact.
3. Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is also disposed of in terms of the order passed in Tarsem Singh's case (supra).
September 20, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
harsha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!