Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20710 P&H
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2024
CWP-23553-2024 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
(246)
CWP-23553-2024
Date of decision:- 21.11.2024
M/s Bhullar Micro Breweries ... Petitioner
Versus
Euthoria Developers Pvt. Ltd. And another ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL
Present:- Mr. Vivek Salathia, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Sandeep Vermani, Advocate for respondent No.1.
****
SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL)
1. Petitioner has approached this Court under Article 226/227 of the
Constitution of India inter-alia for issuance of a writ in the nature of
certiorari for quashing impugned order dated 28.06.2024, Annexure P-11,
passed by the learned Arbitrator, whereby an application filed under
Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the
Arbitration Act") by the petitioner has been rejected.
2. By making a reference to Arbitration Clause 37.1 of the
agreement, Annexure P-1,, counsel for the petitioner has contended that
power to appoint an Arbitrator has been exclusively vested in respondent
No.1, who has made a unilateral appointment. It has been asserted that the
consent of the petitioner was never obtained and the appointment is
contrary to the decision of the Supreme Court in Perkins Eastman
Architects DPC and another Versus HSCC (India) Ltd., 2020(20) SCC
3. Counsel for the respondent No.1 has contested the petition and
supported the appointment, but upon instructions from Mr. Vikram Singh,
authenticity of this order/judgment
Legal Advisor of respondent No.1 submits that he does not have any
objection, in case, the mandate of the already appointed Arbitrator is
terminated and a substitute Arbitrator is appointed in her place.
4. Counsel for the petitioner has given concurrence to this course
being adopted.
5. In view, thereof, mandate of the Arbitrator appointed by
respondent No.1 vide letter dated 09.03.2024, Annexure R-4/1, is
terminated and in her place, Mr. Justice (Retd.) R.L. Anand, a former Judge
of this Court, resident of # E 223, Ranjit Avenue, Amritsar, Mobile No.
98721-74499, is nominated as an Arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute
between the parties, subject to compliance of statutory provisions.
6. Parties are directed to appear before the learned Arbitrator on
date, time and place fixed and communicated by the learned Arbitrator at
his convenience.
7. Parties will be at liberty to raise all claims, counter claims,
defences, pleas etc. before the learned Arbitrator.
8. Needless to mention that all the questions arising between the
parties in this matter will remain open for determination in the arbitral
proceedings and any observation hereinabove made will not be binding on
the learned Arbitrator.
9. A request letter alongwith a copy of the order be sent to Mr.
Justice (Retd.) R.L.Anand.
21.11.2024 (SUVIR SEHGAL)
Kamal JUDGE
Whether Speaking/Reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!