Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Gurdev Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 20409 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20409 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Gurdev Singh And Ors vs State Of Punjab And Anr on 18 November, 2024

Author: Kirti Singh

Bench: Kirti Singh

                                      Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:150350



CRM-M-43009-2024


                                              - 1-


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH
297
                                                     CRM-M-43009-2024
                                                     Date of decision: 18.11.2024

GURDEV SINGH AND ORS                                              ....Petitioners

                                Versus

STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR                                             ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH

Present :   Mr. Amit Arora, Advocate
            for the petitioners.

            Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, AAG, Punjab.

            Mr. P.S. Kanwar, Advocate for respondent No.2.

KIRTI SINGH. J.(Oral)

1. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for

quashing of FIR No.138 dated 05.11.2019, under Sections 325, 323, 506 & 34

IPC, registered at Police Station Jhabal, District Tarn Taran along with all

consequential proceedings arising thereform, on the basis of compromise

(Annexure P2).

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and also gone through the case

file.

3. This Court while issuing notice of motion vide order dated

03.09.2024, directed the parties to appear before the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate

for recording their statements with regard to the compromise.

4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, report dated 24.09.2024 has been

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:150350

CRM-M-43009-2024

- 2-

received from the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Tarn Taran. A perusal of the said

report reveals that statements of the concerned persons have been recorded in the

present case, who have stated that the matter has been settled between them and

they have no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed. The compromise

effected between them is genuine, without any undue influence and coercion.

5. The Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others vs. State

of Punjab, 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, held that High Court has power under

Section 482 Cr.P.C. to allow the compounding of non-compoundable offence and

quash the prosecution where the High Court is of the view that the same was

required to prevent the abuse of the process of law or otherwise to secure the ends

of justice. This power of quashing is not confined to matrimonial disputes alone.

6. Hon'ble the Supreme Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of

Punjab and another, 2012 (4) RCR (Criminal) 543, had observed that in order to

secure the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of process of Court, inherent

power can be used by this Court to quash criminal proceedings in which a com-

promise has been effected. The relevant portion of para 57 of the said judgment

reads thus:-

"57. The position that emerges from the above discussion can be summarised thus: the power of the High Court in quashing a criminal proceeding or FIR or complaint in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is distinct and different from the power given to a criminal court for com- pounding the offences under Section 320 of the Code.

Inherent power is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation but it has to be exercised in accord with the guideline engrafted in such power viz; (i) to secure the ends of justice or (ii) to prevent abuse of the

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:150350

CRM-M-43009-2024

- 3-

process of any Court.

xxx xxx xxx. "

7. In view of the afore-referred judgments, perusing the report of the

trial Court regarding amicable settlement between the petitioner(s) and the com-

plainant, this Court finds that quashing the FIR will accord a quietus to all dis-

putes between the parties and it is in the interest of both sides to bury the hatchet

and lead a peaceful life. Thus, no useful purpose would be served in continuing

the proceedings and in order to secure the ends of justice, the criminal proceedings

in the present case deserve to be quashed.

8. Resultantly, the present petition is allowed and FIR No.138 dated

05.11.2019, under Sections 325, 323, 506 & 34 IPC, registered at Police Station

Jhabal, District Tarn Taran and all other consequential proceedings are quashed

qua the petitioner(s) on the basis of the compromise (Annexure P2), subject to

payment of costs of Rs.10,000/- to be deposited in the Poor Patient Welfare Fund,

PGIMER, Chandigarh within a period of one month.

9. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.





                                                         (KIRTI SINGH)
18.11.2024                                                  JUDGE
amandeep
             Whether speaking/reasoned.              :     Yes/No
             Whether Reportable.                     :     Yes/No




                                     3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter