Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20394 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 November, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:149502
-1-
CWP-30852
30852 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-30852
30852 of 2024
Date of decision: 18.11.2024
Gurdit Singh
......Petitioner
Versus
Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab and others
......Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT KUMAR
Present: - Mr. D.V. Sharma, Senior, Advocate,
with Ms. Shivani Sharma, Advocate, and
Mr. Tushar Sharma-I,I, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab.
NAMIT KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
1. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking quashing of order of dismissal dated 29.08.2017 (Annexure P P-4) and for reinstating the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits and thereafter retire him from service service w.e.f. 30.06.2022 and pay the retiral dues viz. gratuity, leave encashment and employer's share of employees provident fund along with the security deposit of the petitioner with interest.
2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was dismissed from service vide order dated 29.08.2017 (Annexure re P-4) P 4) on the basis of conviction in the criminal case in which the petitioner has now been acquitted by this Court vide judgment dated 28.05.2024 (Annexure P-6) P 6) and thereafter the petitioner has submitted representation dated 05.06.2024 (Annexure P P-7) followed by legal notice dated 03.09.2024 (Annexure P-8) P 8) for reinstatement in service.
However, neither the petitioner has been notionally reinstated reinstated, as the petitioner has already crossed crossed the age of superannuation superannuation, nor the said
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:149502
CWP-30852 30852 of 2024
legal notice has been replied to. He submits that at this stage, petitioner would be satisfied, if the said legal notice is considered and decided by passing a speaking order in a time-bound time bound frame.
3. Notice of motion.
4. Mr. Rajesh Sehgal, Addl. A.G., Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents and has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through gh the record of the case.
6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case or the claim being made by the petitioner in the present petition, respondent No.3 is directed to consider and decide the claim made by the petitioner in legal notice dated 03.09.2024 (Annexure P P-8) in accordance with law, by passing a speaking order within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. In case, respondent No.3 is not the competent authority, the matter shall be sent to the competent authority by him.
7. The petition stands disposed of.
(NAMIT KUMAR)
18.11.2024 JUDGE
R.S.
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!