Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 20182 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 November, 2024
APURVA
2024.11.14 13:38
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
Village Bainstaniwal, Tehsil and District Hoshiarpur
Bainstaniwal
vide order dated 10.01.2019 (Annexure P-4).
07.09.2022
(Annexure P-5).
13.05.2024 (Annexure P-6)
the choice of learned Collector is not to be lightly interfered
APURVA
2024.11.14 13:38
I attest to the accuracy and
authenticity of this
document/judgment
High Court, Chandigarh
with, even if two views are possible.
6. There are concurrent findings recorded by the revenue
authorities below in favour of respondent No.5, who is an ex-serviceman and
is more qualified than the petitioner, having educational qualification of
pre-university.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to point out
any illegality or perversity in order dated 10.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) passed
by the learned District Collector, Hoshiarpur; which was further affirmed by
the learned Divisional Commissioner as well as the learned Financial
Commissioner.
8. In view of the aforesaid discussion, I do not find any merit in
this writ petition and the same is accordingly dismissed. The order dated
10.01.2019 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned District Collector,
Hoshiarpur, appointing respondent No.5 as Lambardar of Village
Bainstaniwal, Tehsil and District Hoshiarpur; as affirmed by the learned
Commissioner, Jalandhar Division, Jalandhar vide order dated 07.09.2022
(Annexure P-5) as well as the learned Financial Commissioner (Appeals),
Punjab vide order dated 13.05.2024 (Annexure P-6); is hereby upheld.
9. All pending application(s), if any, shall also stand closed.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!