Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Manish Alias Baba vs State Of Haryana And Anr
2024 Latest Caselaw 19936 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19936 P&H
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Manish Alias Baba vs State Of Haryana And Anr on 11 November, 2024

                                  Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146885




294.
       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                    AT CHANDIGARH
                                          CRA
                                          CRA-S-3281-2024
                                          Date of decision: 11.11.2024
Manish alias Baba                                            .... Appellant


                                 Versus


State of Haryana and another                                .... Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURBIR SINGH

Present:    Mr. Harender S. Rana, Advocate for
            Mr. Shailener Singh Momi, Advocate, for the appellant.

            Mr. Rajiv Sidhu, DAG, Haryana with SI Balbir Singh.
                              ----

GURBIR SINGH, SINGH J.

1. The present appeal has been filed against the judgment dated

18.05.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Charkhi Dadri

whereby second regular bail application of the appellant filed in case FIR

No.102, dated ted 18.04.2022, under Sections 148, 149, 323, 341, 506 of IPC

and Section 3(2)(va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes

(Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (Section 34 of IPC added lateron and

Sections 148, 149 of IPC deleted lateron), registered at Police Station Dadri

City, District Charkhi Dadri, has been dismissed.

2. As per office report, despite having served, no one has put in

appearance on behalf of respondent No.2-complainant.

No.2 complainant.

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146885

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant has

argued that the appellant has been named in the present FIR on the basis of

disclosure statement of co-accused Aman. Appellant was granted bail vide

order dated 04.08.2022 and challan was presented against three accused

including the appellant and all other accused named in the FIR were

exonerated by the police. However, on 25.05.2023, the appellant could not

appear before the Court and his bail was cancelled. Proclamation was

issued against him. He was arrested in some other case. He was produced

before the Court through production warrants on 16.01.2024 and is in

custody since then in this case.

3.1 Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the absence of

the appellant before the trial Court was unintentional. Completion of trial

will take long time. Appellant is being involved in one and the other case.

4. Learned State counsel has opposed the bail to the appellant by

contending that the appellant is habitual offender. He is involved in 13

other cases. He is facing trial in 10 cases and acquitted in three cases.

5. I have heard the submissions of learned counsel for the parties.

6. Considering the fact that it is on the basis of disclosure

statement, appellant has been nominated in the present case; earlier he was

granted bail, but lateron, he absented from the Court and is in custody since

16.01.2024; completion of trial will take long time to conclude; pendency

of other cases is no ground to decline bail, this Court deems it appropriate

to release the petitioner on regular bail.

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:146885

7. Accordingly, without commenting on the merits of the case,

the order dated 18.05.2024 passed by learned trial Court is set aside and the

appellant is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing

bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of concerned learned trial Court,

with the further condition that he shall get his mobile number registered in

the trial Court for receiving messages on CIS system and shall not change

his mobile number during the pendency of the case. He shall also furnish

his residential address to the trial Court as well as to the concerned police

station and shall not change his residence without intimation to the

concerned court. The court concerned may impose any other condition as it

deems fit. In case of default, the trial Court is free to cancel the bail granted

to the appellant.

8. The appeal is allowed on the above terms.

9. However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove

shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case

and the trial Court shall decide the case on the basis of material available

before it.

(GURBIR SINGH) JUDGE November 11, 2024 sanjeev Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No

3 of 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter