Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19338 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:142975
CWP-29642-2024 1
119
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-29642-2024
Date of Decision:04.11.2024
AMARJIT SINGH AND ORS ......... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. Surendra Pant, Advocate and
Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles
226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents
to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying
service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that
case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court
in Harbans Lal Vs. State of Punjab in CWP No.2371 of 2010 and
Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in CWP
No.9936 of 2017.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is
present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgments of this
Court, the respondent authorities in the case of various officials have
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:142975
considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that
appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of
judgments of this Court in Harbans Lal and Sukhjit Singh (supra) and
pass an appropriate order within 3 months from today.
4. In the wake of statement of both side, the present petition
stands disposed of.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
04.11.2024
Ali
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!