Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 19328 P&H
Judgement Date : 4 November, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:143039
CRM-M-54336-2024 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
112 CRM-M-54336-2024
Date of Decision : November 04, 2024
SHRI DUTT -PETITIONER
V/S
ANAND JAIN -RESPONDENT
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI
Present: Mr. Rajesh Bansal, Advocate
for the petitioner.
***
KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (ORAL)
1. Through the instant petition, the petitioner assails the order
dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure P-1), whereby, although the learned Additional
Sessions Judge concerned has ordered his release on bail and suspended his
sentence, however, the said concession has been extended subject to him
depositing 20% of the compensation amount in the Court concerned, within
a month therefrom.
2. As a matter of fact, the learned trial Court concerned has,
through drawing the verdict of conviction dated 06.09.2024 and the
consequent thereto order of sentence dated 07.09.2024, upon case bearing
No. NACT/91/2019, convicted the petitioner for commission of offence
punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
(hereinafter referred to as the 'N.I. Act'), and, sentenced him to undergo
simple imprisonment for two years and to pay double of the cheque amount
i.e. ₹ 4,60,000/-.
3. The verdict of conviction and order of sentence (supra) caused
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:143039
pain to the petitioner and triggered him to institute thereagainst a statutory
appeal before the learned appellate court concerned, which is pending
consideration. However, the learned appellate court concerned has, through
the impugned order dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure P-1), although ordered
release of the petitioner on bail and suspended his sentence on furnishing
bail bonds in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in the like amount,
however, the said concession has been extended subject to him depositing
20% of the compensation amount in the Court concerned, within a month
therefrom. Feeling aggrieved by this impugned order, the petitioner has now
approached this Court, through the instant petition.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner, in his assailing the
impugned order dated 04.10.2024 (Annexure P-1), submits that the case of
the petitioner falls in "exceptional category", inasmuch as, he does not have
any means to make payment of even 20% of the awarded compensation
amount.
5. To buttress his submission, the learned counsel for the
petitioner has placed reliance upon the judgment rendered by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in "Jamboo Bhandari V/s M.P. State Industrial
Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.", 2023(3) Law Herald (SC) 2433.
6. On a specific query being posed by this Court, vis-a-vis,
"whether the petitioner has, or, has not, made an application before the
learned appellate court concerned till date, thereby bringing the aforesaid
facts on record", the learned counsel for the petitioner returned an answer
in negative.
7. In such circumstances, this Court, at this stage, refrains from
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:143039
making any interference in the matter and deems it appropriate to relegate
the petitioner to the learned appellate court concerned, by making an
appropriate motion. In case, the petitioner falls within "exceptional
category", as per the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in this
regard, thereupon the learned appellate court concerned shall make a
decision on the application, if any preferred by the petitioner, as per law.
8. Disposed of accordingly.
(KULDEEP TIWARI)
November 04, 2024 JUDGE
devinder
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether Reportable : Yes/No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!