Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Pal Infrastructure And Developers ... vs State Of Haryana And Another
2024 Latest Caselaw 9487 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9487 P&H
Judgement Date : 2 May, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Pal Infrastructure And Developers ... vs State Of Haryana And Another on 2 May, 2024

                                       Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:061021
                                                                                 1

CRM-M No.42250 of 2019 (O&M)                                 2024:PHHC:061021


            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

267
                                        CRM-M No.42250 of 2019 (O&M)
                                        Date of Decision: 02.05.2024


M/S PAL INFRASTRUCTURE AND DEVELOPERS (P) LTD AND
OTHERS
                                     ......Petitioner(s)

             Vs

STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER                                 ...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:     Mr. Mohak Arora, Advocate for
             Mr. Manish Soni, Advocate
             for the petitioners.

             Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Asstt. A.G., Haryana.

             Mr. Dharamvir Sharma, Advocate
             for respondent No.2
                    ****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)

1. By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer is

made for quashing of FIR No.61 dated 03.03.2014 registered under Sections

406/420/467/471/34 & 506 IPC at Police Station Bhupani District Faridabad,

Haryana along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of

compromise.

2. Notice of motion was issued on 01.10.2019 and both the parties were

directed to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their

statements with regard to the validity of compromise. However, the parties could

not appear before the Trial Court on the date fixed and as such the parties were

again directed to appear before the Trial Court vide order dated 06.02.2024 for

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:061021

CRM-M No.42250 of 2019 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:061021

making their statements as regards veracity of compromise arrived at between

them.

3. In pursuance of the aforesaid order dated 01.10.2019 and 06.02.2024

passed by this Court, whereby the parties were directed to appear before the Trial

Court for getting their statements recorded as regards the veracity of compromise

arrived at between them, a report dated 23.02.2024 has been received from the

concerned court, stating that compromise effected between the parties is genuine,

voluntary and without any coercion or undue influence. No accused has been

declared as proclaimed offender

4. Thus once, the compromise has been arrived at between the parties

without any pressure and respondent No.2 having no objection as regards quashing

of FIR as well as all other subsequent proceedings arising out of the same against

the petitioner(s); there does not appear to be any impediment as regards quashing

of present FIR qua the petitioner(s). Even otherwise, in order to maintain peace and

harmony between the parties, particularly under the present circumstances wherein

the alleged offences have no societal interest involved, it would be appropriate to

render complete quietus to the aforementioned dispute by quashing the FIR on the

basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

5. The parties having settled their dispute so as to live in peace in future,

no useful purpose would be served by proceeding further with the criminal

proceedings. In the light of above developments, no cause remains for the Trial

Court to invest further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR. The compromise in

question is even found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:061021

CRM-M No.42250 of 2019 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:061021

Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal)

1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.

6. Moreover, learned counsel for the petitioners on instructions from his

client, submit that they volunteer to serve public cause by providing one LED

Electro Cautery Machine, Brand Delta to the Civil Hospital, Faridabad, Haryana.

7. Thus, in view of the aforesaid facts, accompanied by statements of

both the parties as well as keeping in mind the law laid down in the

aforementioned judgments, the FIR No.61 dated 03.03.2014 registered under

Sections 406/420/467/471/34 & 506 IPC at Police Station Bhupani District

Faridabad, Haryana as well as all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom are

hereby quashed qua the petitioners.

8. Accordingly, petition stands allowed, however, subject to providing

one LED Electro Cautery Machine, Brand Delta to the Civil Hospital, Faridabad,

Haryana within a period of two weeks from today as volunteered by the petitioners

against due receipt issued by the concerned Civil Surgeon, who shall prepare an

inventory in this regard for its regular inspection by the Director concerned. A

copy of the receipt shall also sent to the office Advocate General, Haryana at the

earliest for maintaining records in this regard.


                                               (HARKESH MANUJA)
May 02, 2024                                       JUDGE
Atik
             Whether speaking/reasoned         Yes/No
             Whether reportable                Yes/No




                                      3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter