Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10365 P&H
Judgement Date : 14 May, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:067098
CWP-11141-2024 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
128 CWP-11141-2024
Date of Decision : 14.05.2024
ROOP SINGH AND ORS ... PETITIONERS
V/S
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. J.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles
226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents
to count the service rendered as Special Police Officer as qualifying
service for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that
case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court
in Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in
CWP No.9936 of 2017.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is
present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgments of this
Court, the respondents authorities in the case of various officials have
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:067098
considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that
appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of
judgments of this Court in Sukhjit Singh (supra) and pass an
appropriate order within 3 months from today.
4. In the wake of statements of both side, the present petition
stands disposed of.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL )
JUDGE
14.05.2024
anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!