Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chamkaur Singh vs Primary Co-Op. Agricultural ...
2024 Latest Caselaw 5835 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5835 P&H
Judgement Date : 14 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Chamkaur Singh vs Primary Co-Op. Agricultural ... on 14 March, 2024

                                                    Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036930




                                            Neutral Citation No. 2024:PHHC:036930
133
      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
                  AT CHANDIGARH

                                          CRM-M No. 13186 of 2024 (O&M)
                                          Date of Decision: 14.03.2024

Chamkaur Singh
                                                                  .......... Petitioner
                                        Versus

Primary Co-op Agricultural Development Bank Ltd.
(PADB), Malerkotla
                                                               .......... Respondent

CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:      Mr. Gaurav Vir Singh Behl, Advocate,
              for the petitioner.

                                ****
HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL)

The petitioner, by way of present petition filed under Section

482 Cr.P.C., seeks quashing of the order dated 21.12.2023 (Annexure P-9)

passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, whereby a

condition was imposed upon the petitioner for deposit of 20% of the total

amount of compensation within 60 days from that order in case No. CRA-

499-2023, titled "Chamkaur Singh Versus Primary Co-op. Agricultural

Development Bank Ltd. etc.".

[2] Briefly stating, having been implicated in a complaint under

Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (for short "NI Act"),

filed at the instance of respondent-complainant, the petitioner came to be

convicted vide judgment dated 04.12.2023 and sentenced vide order of even

date passed by the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Malerkota, to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for one year, besides payment of compensation to the

tune of double of the cheque amount to the complainant.

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036930

Aggrieved thereof, the petitioner preferred first appeal

alongwith application for suspension of sentence before the Court of

Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur, whereby, vide order dated 21.12.2023,

he was directed to deposit 20% of the total amount of compensation

awarded by the trial Court within 60 days from that order, i.e. 21.12.2023

and the order of suspension of his remaining sentence was made subject

thereto.

[3] Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order dated

21.12.2023 has been passed without appreciating the exceptional

circumstances put forth by the petitioner before the First Appellate Court

and also without taking into consideration the exposition of law rendered by

the Hon'ble Supreme Court in case "Jamboo Bhandari Versus M.P. State

Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. & Ors.", reported as 2023 (4)

RCR (Criminal) 296.

[4] I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through

the paper-book.

[5] Considering the exposition of law by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in case of Jamboo Bhandari (supra), in the humble opinion of this

Court, the matter needs to be remitted back to the First Appellate Court with

a request to hear and decide on the exceptional circumstances put forth by

the petitioner as regards the non-filing of civil recovery proceedings at the

instance of respondent-Bank and other submissions by appreciating those in

terms of law laid down in Jamboo Bhandari (supra).

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036930

[6] The aforesaid exercise may be carried out within a period two

months from today and till then, the condition of deposit of 20% of the total

amount of compensation shall remain stayed.

[7]             Disposed off accordingly.

[8]             In the humble opinion of this Court, the present petition is

disposed off without issuance of any notice to the respondent as it may

further delay the cause of respondent besides putting it to unnecessarily

litigation.

[9] It is made clear that this order may not be construed as an

expression of opinion on the merits of the case.

March 14, 2024                                          ( HARKESH MANUJA )
'dk kamra'                                                   JUDGE

              Whether Speaking/reasoned                  Yes/No

              Whether Reportable                         Yes/No




                                                       Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036930

                                   3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter