Wednesday, 03, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Lovepreet Singh vs State Of Punjab
2024 Latest Caselaw 5678 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5678 P&H
Judgement Date : 13 March, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Lovepreet Singh vs State Of Punjab on 13 March, 2024

                                                              Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035690




                                                                    2024:PHHC:035690
215
 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
                                          Crl. Misc. No. M-654 of 2024 (O&M)
                                          Date of Decision: March 13, 2024

Lovepreet Singh
                                                                           ......Petitioner
                                          versus

State of Punjab
                                                                           .....Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR
                                               ***
Present:-    Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate
             for the petitioner

             Mr. Sandeep Kumar, DAG Punjab
                                   ***

Harpreet Singh Brar, J. (Oral)

CRM-471-2024

Application is allowed as prayed for.

Crl. Misc. No. M-654 of 2024

1. This is the first petition filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. seeking

grant of regular bail to the petitioner in the case bearing FIR No. 292 dated

09.10.2023 registered under Sections 21(c), 29 of NDPS Act, 1985 at Police

Station City Tarn Taran, District Tarn Taran, Punjab.

2. As per the case of the prosecution, the present FIR was registered on

the allegations that on 09.10.2023 the petitioner along with co-accused namely

Sonu Singh alias Sonu were intercepted by the police party while they were seen

coming walking at around 12.25 A.M. midnight while carrying bags on their

shoulders. On seeing the police party they both got perplexed

and turned back. On suspicion they were arrested and upon search of

the polythene bag recovered from applicant/accused it was found to contain

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035690

2024:PHHC:035690

Heroin which upon weighment came out to be total 150 grams of Heroin and

drug money amounting to Rs.6,000/- was also recovered Upon search of the

polythene bag recovered from the co-accused namely Sonu it was found to

contain Heroin which upon weighment came out to be total 350 grams of heroin

and drug money amounting to Rs, 14,000/-.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that

admittedly the alleged recovery from the petitioner does not fall under the ambit

of commercial quantity and as such the embargo created by Section 37 of the

NDPS Act would not be applicable. He relies upon judgment passed in Amar

Singh Ramjibhai Barot vs. State of Gujrat, 2005(7) SCC 550. It is further

contended that that in view of the ratio of law laid down in Amar Singh

Ramjibhai Barot(supra) if two accused are found together carrying contraband,

then quantity of contraband carried by both the accused could not be added to

bring it within the meaning of the commercial quantity. The petitioner is

behind the bars since 09.10.2023.

4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the grant of regular bail to

the petitioner on the ground that the petitioner was caught while carrying the

contraband and he is habitual offender and is involved in one more case under

the NDPS Act.

5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and after perusing the

record of the case, it transpires that the petitioner is behind the bars since

09.10.2023. So further incarceration of the petitioner without there being the

prospect of the conclusion of the trial in the near future, would be violative of

Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Culpability, if any, would be determined

at the time of trial.

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035690

2024:PHHC:035690

6. Keeping in view the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court

of India in 'Prabhakar Tewari Vs. State of U.P. and Another', 2020 (1) R.C.R.

(Criminal) 831 and Maulana Mohd. Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P. and others,

2012(2) SCC 382, the involvement of the petitioner in other cases would not be a

ground to refuse grant of concession of regular bail.

7. In view of the above, the present petition is allowed and petitioner-

Lovepreet Singh is ordered to be released on regular bail subject to his furnishing

requisite bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned trial

Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Magistrate.

8. Nothing observed hereinabove shall be construed as expression

of opinion of this Court on merits of the case and the trial Court shall proceed

without being prejudiced by observations of this Court.

(HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE March 13, 2024 reena

Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:035690

3 of 3

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter