Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5554 P&H
Judgement Date : 12 March, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036353
CWP-16557-2016 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:035449
CWP-17474-2017 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
105+230-2 cases
CWP-16557-2016 (O&M)
Date of decision: 12.03.2024
Salwinder
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CWP-17474-2017 (O&M)
Jaswinder Kaur
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY
*****
Present : Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advocate for Mr. P.S. Khurana, Advocate for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Charanpreet Singh, AAG, Punjab.
***** AMAN CHAUDHARY. J.
CM-4386-CWP-2019 in CWP-16557-2016 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Annexure P-9 is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.
Main Case(s)
1. This common order shall dispose of the above petitions as they
involve the same issue.
2. The prayer in the present petitions filed under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus,
for directing the respondents to grant the regular pay scale and other allowances
w.e.f. 10.06.2023, and further for quashing the condition of the applicability of
new contributory pension scheme qua the petitioners and also directing the
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036353
CWP-16557-2016 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:035449
respondents to consider their claim for pension and other benefits as regular
employees.
3. Learned counsel would submit that his case is for the grant of
benefits arising out of regularization inasmuch as for old pension scheme and to
treat the service prior to regularization as qualifying service towards old
pension scheme. He relies on the judgments of this Court in Harbans Lal vs.
The State of Punjab and others, 2012(3) SCT 362 and LPA-666-2022, titled
as Municipal Council, Radian vs. Musthaq Masih and others, decided on
21.12.2023. He on instructions prays, that the petitioners would be satisfied, in
case a time bound direction is given to the respondents to consider their claim,
keeping in view the aforesaid judgments.
4. Learned State counsel has no objection to the limited prayer made.
5. In view of the aforesaid and without commenting upon the merits
of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to respondents to
consider and decide their claims, by taking into account the aforesaid
judgments, within a period of 6 months and if found entitled, necessary benefit
be granted to the petitioners forthwith.
6. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of connected case.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY)
JUDGE
12.03.2024
Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No
Whether reportable : Yes / No
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:036353
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!