Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10755 P&H
Judgement Date : 3 July, 2024
207
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-12997-1998 (O&M)
DECIDED ON: 03.07.2024
M/S YR KUMAR AND COMPANY .....PETITIONER
VERSUS
REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER AND
ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH.
Present: None for the petitioner.
Mr. Rajesh Hooda, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
SANJAY VASHISTH, J (ORAL)
1. After noticing the fact that Mr. V.G. Dogra, Advocate, who
filed present writ petition, has expired, fresh notice was issued to the
petitioner, at the address mentioned in the present writ petition.
2. As per office note, notice issued to the petitioner has been
received back unserved with a report that "company locked for a long
time".
3. In the absence of any assistance on behalf of the petitioner,
this Court is unable to move with the proceedings of the present writ
petition.
4. Thus, this Court is left with no other option, except to
dismiss the present writ petition for non-prosecution.
5. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
authenticity of this order/judgment
CWP-12997-1998 (O&M) -2-
6. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move an
appropriate application for revival of the present writ petition, within a
period of 12 weeks from today, in case, any substantial cause of action
requiring its adjudication, still exists.
Let copy of this order be forwarded at the address of the
petitioner as mentioned in the present writ petition.
(SANJAY VASHISTH)
03.07.2024 JUDGE
Lavisha
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether reportable Yes/ No
authenticity of this order/judgment
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!