Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10522 P&H
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:080797
CWP No. 14356 of 2024
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
(131) CWP No. 14356 of 2024
Date of Decision : 01.07.2024
Manvir Singh and others
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Swapan Shorey, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
***
Harsimran Singh Sethi J. (Oral)
In the present petition, the grievance being raised by the
petitioners is that the petitioners had completed one year of service before
their retirement but the benefit of increment for the said service was not
granted to them.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in
view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal
No. 2471 of 2023 titled as The Director (Admn. and HR) KPTCL and
Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani and Ors. decided on 11.04.2023, the
petitioners are entitled for the grant of benefit of one increment and
thereafter, entitled for the revision of their pensionary benefits
accordingly.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
petitioners have already raised the said grievance in the legal notice dated
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:080797
06.02.2024 (Annexure P-4) but the same is still pending consideration
with the respondents and the petitioners will be satisfied, at this stage, in
case a direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same by
passing an appropriate speaking order in a time bound manner.
3. Notice of motion.
4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Swapan Shorey, learned
Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice
on behalf of the respondent-State and submits that in case, the legal notice
dated 06.02.2024 (Annexure P-4) has been received in the office of the
concerned authorities and the same is still pending consideration with the
authorities concerned, the same will be decided by the competent
authority within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of
certified copy of this order by passing an appropriate speaking order.
Learned State counsel further submits that in case, it is found feasible to
accept the claim of the petitioners, the same will be accepted, otherwise
due reasons will be mentioned for not accepting the claim of the
petitioners in the speaking order to be passed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that keeping in
view the statement of learned State counsel, the present petition may
kindly be disposed of having been not pressed any further.
6. Ordered accordingly.
July 01, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
kanchan JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!