Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1894 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 January, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:011410
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
102 2024:PHHC:011410
CWP No.8515 of 2023
Date of Decision:29.01.2024
Dalbir Singh
....Petitioner
vs.
Union of India and others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present: Mr. Karan Chaudhary, Advocate
for the petitioner
Ms. Shweta Nahata, Senior Panel Counsel
for the Union of India
***
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to re-issue passport
with correct date of birth.
2. Counsel for the petitioner inter alia contends that in the
passport, date of birth of the petitioner has been recorded as 03.05.1962
whereas his correct date of birth is 07.11.1964. The petitioner has applied
for correction of date of birth in 2022 on the basis of Matriculation
certificate, however, till date needful has not been done.
3. Learned counsel for Union of India submits that in the earlier
two passports, date of birth of the petitioner was mentioned as 03.05.1962.
The documents on which petitioner is placing reliance were in the custody of
the petitioner and he did not point out mistake at that point of time.
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:011410
CWP No.8515 of 2023 -2- 2024:PHHC:011410
4. The change of date of birth in the passport is not going to create
any right in favour of the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking correction of
date of birth in the passport just to synchronize said document with the other
documents. He submits that the matriculation certificate is a reliance
evidence, thus, the passport authorities were not justified in refusing to
correct the date of birth. He relies upon Division Bench judgment of this
Court in Resham Singh vs. Union of India and another, 2008(1)
RCR(Civil) 131.
5. A perusal of Resham Singh (supra) shows that instructions
dated 18.04.2001 issued by the Ministry of External Affairs directing a
Passport Officer to refuse correction of date of birth when there are
contradictory documents evidencing the same has been held to be illegal. It
has been held that a Passport Officer has jurisdiction to issue a passport and
accordingly in view of Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897 he would
also have authority to correct the same. Statutory powers available to an
official can not be whittled down by instructions. It has also been held that a
birth certificate takes primacy over any other document so far as evidence of
date of birth is concerned.
6. In view of the law laid down in Resham Singh (supra),
counsel for Union of India submits that petitioner may be directed to appear
before the passport authority alongwith requisite documents. Thereafter, the
passport authority would pass an appropriate order within six weeks.
7. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid
arrangement.
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:011410
CWP No.8515 of 2023 -3- 2024:PHHC:011410
8. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands
disposed of subject to deposit of Rs. 10,000/- as costs by way of Demand
Draft in favour of Regional Passport Officer, Jalandhar with the State Bank
of India, Main Branch at Jalandhar. The petitioner is directed to appear
before the passport authority on 19.02.2024 alongwith requisite documents
and proof of deposit of costs. On doing so, the passport authority would pass
an appropriate order within six weeks from 19.02.2024.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 29.01.2024 paramjit
Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:011410
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!