Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9253 P&H
Judgement Date : 30 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:058802
CWP-9787-2024 1 2024:PHHC:058802
123
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CWP-9787-2024
Date of Decision:30.04.2024
ASI/LR RAJESH KUMAR ......... Petitioner
Versus
STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS ..... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr. B.S. Sidhu, Advocate
for the petitioner.
Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioner through instant petition under Articles
226/227 of the Constitution of India is seeking direction to respondents to
count the service rendered as Special Police Officer for qualifying service
for the purpose of pensionary/retiral benefits.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, inter alia, contends that
case of the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court in
Sukhjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others in CWP
No.9936 of 2017.
3. Mr. Aman Dhir, DAG, Punjab who on advance notice is
present in Court submits that in terms of above stated judgments of this
Court, the respondents authorities in the case of various officials have
considered their claim and passed orders. He further asserts that
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:058802
CWP-9787-2024 2 2024:PHHC:058802
appropriate authority would consider case of the petitioners in terms of
judgments of this Court in Sukhjit Singh (supra) and pass an
appropriate order within 3 months from today.
4. In the wake of statements of both side, the present petition
stands disposed of.
( JAGMOHAN BANSAL ) JUDGE 30.04.2024 Ali Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Whether Reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!