Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 9130 P&H
Judgement Date : 29 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:057756
CWP-21325-2017 -1- 2024:PHHC:057756
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
211 CWP-21325-2017
Date of Decision : 29.04.2024
TEK CHAND AND ORS. ... PETITIONERS
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ... RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL
Present : Mr.Mrinal Dewan, Advocate for
Mr. R.S.Manhas, Advocate
for the petitioners.
Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Sr. Panel Counsel
for the respondents-UOI.
****
JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral)
1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of
the Constitution of India are seeking setting aside of order dated 20.05.2017
(Annexure P-6) whereby the respondents have denied their claim for
regularization of their services.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that he has no
instructions from his clients.
3. Mr. Shivoy Dhir, Sr. Panel Counsel submits that the petitioners
since a long time are not in service. There is no policy of regularization. The
issue involved in the present case is squarely covered by the judgment of
Supreme Court in Union of India and ors. vs. Vartak Labour Union, ( 2011) 4
SCC 200.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:057756 CWP-21325-2017 -2- 2024:PHHC:057756
4. In the wake of statement of learned counsel for the parties, the
present petition is hereby dismissed.
(JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 29.04.2024 anju
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!