Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8946 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2024
2024:PHHC:057319
In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana
At Chandigarh
CRWP-6505-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision:-26.4.2024
Kashmir Singh @ Sheera ... Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GURVINDER SINGH GILL
Present:- Mr. Rajpreet Singh Brar, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Vishavjit Singh Virk, DAG, Punjab,
assisted by ASI Harjit Singh.
*****
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, J.(Oral)
1. The petitioner assails order dated 22.5.2023 (Annexure P-1) passed by
respondent No.3 - District Magistrate, Gurdaspur vide which an application
filed by the petitioner for grant of parole so as to meet members of his
family, has been declined mainly on account of previous conduct of the
petitioner inasmuch as on an previous occasion he had absconded while
availing parole.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it was more than 10 years
back in the year 2011 that the petitioner had jumped parole and that, as such,
on account of efflux of time, the same cannot be taken into account for
declining parole at this stage.
CRWP-6505-2023 (O&M) (2) 2024:PHHC:057319
3. On the other hand, learned State counsel submitted that apart from the
aforesaid conduct when the petitioner jumped parole and remained
absconding for almost 3 years, the antecedents of the petitioner are also not
above board inasmuch he has been involved in 10 more cases and although
he stands acquitted in 7 of such cases, but stands convicted in 3 of these
cases, which include offences under Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances Act and Arms Act.
4. This Court has considered rival submissions addressed before this Court.
5. The petitioner as on date has barely undergone a sentence of about 2 years
out of the imposed sentence of 10 years. Still further, the petitioner seeks
parole by vaguely mentioning that parole is sought to settle household affairs
without delineating the specific reasons. This Court in judgment dated
27.2.2023 rendered in CRWP-7882-2022 titled Deepak Kumar Versus State
of Punjab and others, held that provisions of Section 3(1)(d) of Punjab Good
Conduct Prisoners (Temporary Release) Act, 1962 cannot be invoked for
casual meeting with family members.
6. In view of the aforestated position, this Court does not find any ground to
interfere with the impugned order. The instant petition, as such, is dismissed.
However, it is clarified that the aforesaid order is not to be treated as a bar for
considering the case of pertitioner again as and when any appropriate
application is moved.
26.4.2024 ( Gurvinder Singh Gill )
Pankaj Judge
Whether speaking /reasoned Yes / No
Whether Reportable Yes / No
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!