Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sukhvinder Singh vs State Of Haryana
2024 Latest Caselaw 8939 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8939 P&H
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Sukhvinder Singh vs State Of Haryana on 26 April, 2024

Author: Pankaj Jain

Bench: Pankaj Jain

CRM-M No.19347 of 2024 (O&M) nh: 2024:PHHC:057053

210 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH

CRM-M No.19347 of 2024 (O&M)
Date of decision : 26.04.2024

Sukhvinder Singh ee Petitioner
versus

StateofHaryana Respondent

CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN

ke

Present :- Mr. S.K.Yadav, Advocate
for the petitioner.

Mr. Ashok Kumar Sehrawat, DAG, Haryana.

ke

PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL)

1 This petition has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. for

grant of regular bail in case F.I.R. No.0021 dated 24.01.2024 registered under Section 15(b) of the NDPS Act (for short 'the Act') at Police Station

Sadar Narnaul, District Mahendergarh.

2 As per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner was apprehended and found to be in conscious possession of 5 kg 925 grams of poppy husk.

3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is much less than commercial quantity as the commercial quantity notified under the Act is 50 kg.

4 Custody certificate has been filed. The same is taken on record. As per the custody certificate, the petitioner by now has undergone more than 2 months and 26 days and has clean antecedents.

2024.04.26 16:40

T attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this order/judgment.

CRM-M No.19347 of 2024 (O&M) 2h 2024:PHHC:057053

5 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that challan already stands presented. Most of the witnesses are official witnesses and thus there can not be any apprehension that the petitioner shall tamper with the

evidence.

6 Learned State counsel is not in a position to dispute the aforementioned factual assertions based on record.

7 I have heard learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the records of the case.

8 Without commenting on the merits of the case and considering the incarceration suffered by the petitioner and the fact that there is no apprehension that the petitioner shall tamper with the evidence, the present petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his furnishing bail/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the Ld. Trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned. However, in addition to conditions that may be imposed by the Trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned, the petitioner shall

remain bound by the following conditions :-

(i) The petitioner shall not mis-use the liberty granted.

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence oral or documentary during the trial.

(iii) The petitioner shall not absent himself on any date before the trial.

(iv) The petitioner shall not commit any offence while on bail.

(Vv) The petitioner shall deposit his passport, if any with the trial Court.

(vi) The petitioner shall give his cellphone number to the police authorities and shall not change his cell-phone number without permission of the trial Court.

(vii) The petitioner shall not in any manner try to delay the trial.

9 Needless to say that anything observed herein shall not be

construed to be an opinion on the merits of the case.

(PANKAJ JAIN ) JUDGE 26.04.2024

Pooja sharma-I Whether speaking/reasoned Yes Whether Reportable : No

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter