Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Beant Singh vs State Of Punjab
2024 Latest Caselaw 8828 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8828 P&H
Judgement Date : 25 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Beant Singh vs State Of Punjab on 25 April, 2024

Author: Sandeep Moudgil

Bench: Sandeep Moudgil

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:056690




CRM-M-18845 of 2024                        -1-           2024:PHHC:056690

           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                        AT CHANDIGARH
213
                                                  CRM-M-18845 of 2024
                                                  Date of Decision: 25.04.2024


Beant Singh                                                    ..... Petitioner

                                         Versus

State of Punjab                                                ..... Respondent


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL


Present:      Mr. Satnam Singh Gill, Advocate
              for the petitioner.

              Mr. Rajiv Verma, DAG, Punjab.

                                         *****

SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL)

This is a petition seeking regular bail to the petitioner in FIR

No.197, dated 16.11.2021, under Sections 15 and 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985

and Sections 192 and 207 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, registered at

Police Station Special Task Force, Phase-IV, District SAS Nagar, Mohali.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

was charge for an offence under Section 15 of the NDPS Act while at the

time of apprehension, he was deputed on the offending vehicle i.e. truck

bearing registration No.HR-65-9507 as a conductor which was being driven

by co-accused Avtar Singh. He further submits that the petitioner was not

aware of the material being transported at the truck being merely as a

conductor working on petty wages.

Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a copy of the

order dated 02.09.2021 whereby a Coordinate Bench of this Court has

granted the anticipatory bail to the petitioner in CRM-M-11051-2021.


                                1 of 3

                                 Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:056690




CRM-M-18845 of 2024                     -2-          2024:PHHC:056690

Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has produced the copy

of the custody certificate, which is taken on record and he prays for

dismissal of the instant petition stating that huge quantity of the contraband

i.e. 1600 kgs. of poppy pods were recovered and the petitioner is a habitual

offender as he is involved in other case i.e. in FIR No.89 dated 16.06.2022,

registered at Police Station City 1, Sangrur.

Be that as it may, having gone through the custody certificate,

the petitioner has suffered incarceration of 02 years, 05 months and 04 days

and considering the fact that investigation is complete, challan stands filed,

charges have been framed on 05.11.2022 and the fact that out of total 19

prosecution witnesses, only one has been examined so far which is sufficient

to infer for this Court that the trial will take long time, no useful purpose

would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars for uncertain

period, wherein bail is a rule and jail is an exception and it would also

violate the principle of right to speedy trial and expeditious disposal under

Article 21 of Constitution of India, as has been time and again discussed by

this Court, while relying upon the judgment of the Apex Court passed in

Dataram Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr. 2018(2) R.C.R.

(Criminal) 131.

As far as the pendency of other cases and involvement of the

petitioner in other cases is concerned, reliance can be placed upon the order

of this Court rendered in CRM-M-25914-2022 titled as "Baljinder Singh

alias Rock vs. State of Punjab" decided on 02.03.2023, wherein, while

referring Article 21 of the Constitution of India, this Court has held that no

doubt, at the time of granting bail, the criminal antecedents of the petitioner

are to be looked into but at the same time it is equally true that the

appreciation of evidence during the course of trial has to be looked into with

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:056690

CRM-M-18845 of 2024 -3- 2024:PHHC:056690

reference to the evidence in that case alone and not with respect to the

evidence in the other pending cases.

In view of the above, petitioner is directed to be released on

regular bail on his furnishing bail and surety bonds to the satisfaction of the

trial Court/Duty Magistrate, concerned.

The present petition is, hereby, allowed.

However, it is made clear that anything stated hereinabove shall

not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case.




                                                (SANDEEP MOUDGIL)
25.04.2024                                           JUDGE
D.Bansal

             Whether speaking/reasoned :       Yes/No
             Whether reportable        :       Yes/No




                                3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter