Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8748 P&H
Judgement Date : 24 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:055775-DB
CWP-3587-2021 --1-- 2024:PHHC:055775-DB
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
241-1 CWP-3587-2021
Date of Decision: April 24, 2024
M/s Piccadily Hotels Pvt. Ltd. ......Petitioner(s)
Vs.
State of Haryana and others ......Respondent(s)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA
Present: Mr. Amar Pratap Singh, Advocate
for the petitioner(s).
Mr. Sharan Sethi, Addl. A.G. Haryana.
----
SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA.J. (ORAL)
The petitioner has prayed as under:-
I. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari. Quashing the
Clarification Order (Annexure P-1) Dated 22.08.2013 passed
by respondent No2 as the same is violative of Article 246 of
the Constitution of India:
11. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the
orders dated 18.09.2020 (Annexures P-4, P-7 & P-8) passed
by respondent No.3. As the same have been passed by relying
upon the Clarification order dated 22.08.2013 which is illegal
and violative of Article 246 of the Constitution of India
III. Award Costs throughout to the petitioner.
2. After perusing the case file, we find that the orders dated 18.09.2020
(Annexures P-4, P-7 & P-8) are liable to be set aside, as the same have been
passed by relying upon the clarification order dated 22.08.2013. This Court had
1 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:055775-DB
CWP-3587-2021 --2-- 2024:PHHC:055775-DB
already taken a view in a judgment titled as "M/s Sodexo India Services Private
Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and others" in CWP No.1173 of 2022 decided on
18.04.2024 wherein this Court had held as under:-
9. Thus, we find that the issue is no more res integra and we
follow the view already expressed by the Hon'ble Division Bench
of this Court in relation to GSTR No.1 of 2009 decided on
07.09.2010 and held the action of the respondents in issuing
show cause notice for revision of assessment, Annexure P/2 dated
17.08.2021, to be unjustified and based on wrongful
interpretation of sale in relation to catering business. We also
noticed that the clarification issued in M/s Renginton has failed
to take notice of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of
M/s Cap 'N' Chops Caterers (supra) and such interpretations
may on whims and fancies without taking into consideration the
law as settled by this Court and the amounts to overreaching the
process of the Court and creates unnecessary litigation before
this Court. The clarification is accordingly quashed, hence, set
aside. Henceforth, the law already settled by this Hon'ble Court
in the case of M/s Cap 'N' Chops Caterers (supra), shall apply to
all such like matters. A circular in this regard is directed to be
issued by the Principal Secretary, Excise and Taxation
Department, Haryana, so that, no further litigation arises on this
aspect. A copy of this order is directed to be sent to the Principal
Secretary for necessary compliance."
3. Keeping in view the identical issue having been decided in case M/s
Sodexo India Services Private Ltd.(supra), holding clarification order dated
2 of 3
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:055775-DB
CWP-3587-2021 --3-- 2024:PHHC:055775-DB
22.08.2013 as against settled law, we accordingly set aside the orders dated
18.09.2020 (Annexures P-4, P-7 & P-8).
4. The petition is allowed.
5. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE
(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE
April 24, 2024 sonia arora
Whether speaking/reasoned: Speaking Whether reportable: Yes / No
3 of 3
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!