Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Mohinder Singh Govt Contractor vs Union Of India And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 8379 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8379 P&H
Judgement Date : 22 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

M/S Mohinder Singh Govt Contractor vs Union Of India And Others on 22 April, 2024

Author: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

Bench: Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

                                  Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB




122         IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                       AT CHANDIGARH

                                                 2024:PHHC:053587-DB
                                                 CWP-8994-2024 (O&M)
                                                 Date of Decision: 22.04.2024.


M/s Mohinder Singh Govt. Contractor                                  ...Petitioner

                                         Vs.

Union of India and others                                       ...Respondents


CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA
       HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA

Present      Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
                  ***

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral)

1. Clause 25 of the general conditions of the contract provides for

disputes resolution mechanism and the same reads as under:-

i) If any dispute or differences of any kind what-so-ever

arise between the Authority, its authorized representatives

and the contractor in connection with or arising out of this

contract or the execution of work, these shall be resolved

as under.

ii) Whether before its commencement or during the progress

of Project/Work or after the termination, abandonment or

breach of the contract, the dispute shall, in the first

instance, be referred for settlement to the Engineer of the

work and he shall, within a period of sixty days after

being requested in writing by the contractor to do so,

convey his decision to the contractor. Such decision in

respect of every matter so referred shall, subject to

1 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB

CWP-8994-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:053587-DB

arbitration as hereinafter provided, be final and binding

upon the Contractor. In case the work is already in

process, the contractor shall proceed with the execution of

the work on receipt of the decision of the Engineer as

aforesaid with all due diligence, whether any of the parties

requires arbitration as hereinafter provided or not.

iii) If the Engineer has conveyed his decision to the contractor

and no claim for arbitration has been filed by the

contractor within a period of sixty days from the receipt of

the latter communicating the decision, the said decision

shall be final and binding upon the contractor and will not

be a subject matter of arbitration at all.

iv) If the Engineer fails to convey his decision within a period

of sixty days from the date on which the said request was

made by the contractor, he may refer the dispute for

arbitration as hereinafter provided.

v) All disputes or differences in respect of which the

decision is not final and conclusive shall, at the request of

either party made in communication sent through

registered A.D. post, be referred to the sole arbitration of a

Superintending Engineer of Greater Ludhiana Area

Development Authority acting as such at the time of

reference unless debarred from acting as an Arbitrator by

an order of the Authority, in which event, the Employer

shall appoint any other technical officer of the department

to act as an arbitrator on receipt of a request from either

party.

2 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB

CWP-8994-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:053587-DB

vi) The Employer shall have the authority to change the

arbitrator on an application by either the contractor or the

Engineer requesting change of arbitrator giving reasons

thereof, either before the start of the arbitration

proceedings or during the course of such proceedings. The

arbitration proceedings would stand suspended as soon as

an application for change of Arbitrator is filed before the

Employer and a notice thereof is given by the applicant to

the Arbitrator. The Employer after hearing both the parties

may pass a speaking order rejecting the application or

accepting to change the arbitrator or simultaneously,

appointing a technical officer as Arbitrator under the

contract. The new arbitrator so appointed may enter upon

the reference afresh or he may continue the hearings from

the point these were suspended before the previous

arbitrator.

vii) The reference to the arbitrator shall be made by the

claimant party within one hundred twenty days from the

date of dispute of claim arises during the execution of

work. If the claim pertains to rates or recoveries

introduced in the final bill, the reference to the arbitrator

shall be made within six calendar months from the date of

payment of the final bill to the contractor or from the date

a registered notice is sent to the contractor to the effect

that his final bill is ready by the Engineer (whose decision

in this respect shall be final and binding) whichever is

earlier.

3 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB

CWP-8994-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:053587-DB

viii) It shall be an essential term of this contract that in order to

avoid frivolous claims, the party invoking arbitration shall

specify the disputes based upon facts and calculations

stating the amount claimed under each claim and shall

furnish a "deposit-at-call" for ten percent of the amount

claimed, on a scheduled bank in the name of the

Arbitrator, by his official designation who shall keep the

amount in deposit till the announcement of the award. In

the event of an award in favour of the claimant, the

deposit shall be refunded to him in proportion to the

amount awarded with respect to the amount claimed and

the balance, if any, shall be forfeited and paid to the other

party.

ix) The provisions of the Arbitration and Reconciliation Act,

1996 or any other statuary there under or modification

thereof and for the time being in force shall apply to the

arbitration proceedings under this clause.

x) The arbitrator shall award separately giving his ward

against each time claim and dispute and counter claim

raised by either party giving reasons for his award. Any

lump sum award shall not be legally enforceable.

xi) The independent claims of the party other than one

seeking arbitration as also the counter claims of any party

shall be entertained by the arbitrator.

xii) The venue of arbitration shall be such place or places in

Punjab or Chandigarh as may be fixed by the arbitrator in

4 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB

CWP-8994-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:053587-DB

his sole discretion. The work under the contract shall

continue during the arbitration proceedings.

xiii) The stamp fee due on the award shall be payable by the

party as desired by the Arbitrator and in the event of such

party's default, the stamp fee shall recoverable from

another sum due to such party under this or any other

contract.

xiv) Neither party shall be entitled to bring a claim for

arbitration, if it is not filled as per the time period already

specified or within six months of the following:-

a) Of the date of completion of the work as certified by

the Engineer or

b) Of the date of abandonment of the work or breach of

contract under any of its clauses, or

c) Of its non-commencement or non resumption of work

within 10 days of written notice for commencement or

resumption as applicable or

d) Of the cancellation, termination or withdrawal of the

work from the contractor in whole or in part and / or

revision for closure of the contract, or

e) Of receiving an intimation from the Engineer that the

final payment due or recover from the contractor had been

determined, for the purpose of payment/adjustment

whichever is the latest. If the matter is not referred to

arbitration within the period prescribed above, all the

rights and claims of either party under the contract shall

5 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB

CWP-8994-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:053587-DB

be deemed to have been fortified and absolutely barred by

the time for arbitration and even for civil litigation.

xv) No question relating to this contract shall be brought

before any civil court without first invoking and

completing the arbitration proceedings, if the issue is

covered by the scope of arbitration under the contract. The

pending arbitration proceedings shall not disentitle the

Engineer to terminate the contract and to make alternate

arrangement for completion of the works.

xvi) The arbitrator shall be deemed to have entered on the

reference on the day, he issues notices to the parties fixing

the first date of hearing. The arbitrator may, from time to

time, with the consent of the parties enlarge the initial

time for making and publishing the award.

xvii) The expiry to the contractual time limit, whether

originally fixed or extended, shall not invalidate the

provisions of this clause.

xviii) The jurisdiction of Civil Court for matter under dispute

shall be on the basis of the location of the office of the

Engineer.

2. Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is apparent that the provisions

of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, will have an application, if there is

a dispute arising between the parties on any issue in relation to the terms and

conditions of the contract.

3. Learned counsel has invited attention to Clause 42 relating to the

change/variation in taxes and its implication and submits that in accordance

6 of 7

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053587-DB

CWP-8994-2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:053587-DB

with the change in the rates of taxes from 12% to 18%, Direction Committee

of the Chief Engineer, held a meeting on 28.02.2023 and agreed to release the

additional amount by applying the differential component of 5.35%.

However, in spite of the decision taken, the same has not been implemented

in respect of the petitioner and accordingly he has approached this Court

seeking mandamus.

4. We find that the contract entered into between the parties is a

non-statutory contract and a writ petition for implementation of conditions of

the contract would not lie and would not be maintainable, in view of the

judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of M.P. Power

Management Company Ltd. vs. M/s Sky Powre Southeast Solar India Pvt.

Ltd. and others 2023 (2) SCC 7.

5. We also find that as there is a arbitration clause, the dispute can

very well be taken up by the petitioner before the appropriate forum. In these

circumstances, no interference is made out.

6. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed while

granting liberty to the petitioner as above.

7. All pending misc. application(s) also stand disposed of.

(SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA) JUDGE

(SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE

22.04.2024.

rajesh

1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No

2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No

7 of 7

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter