Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8322 P&H
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2024
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053042
CM-6119-CWP-2024 in/and CWP-32041-2018 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
2024:PHHC:053042
(101) CM-6119-CWP-2024 in/and
CWP-32041-2018
Date of Decision : April 20, 2024
Babu Lal .. Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana and others .. Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Present: Mr. R.K. Malik, Senior Advocate, with
Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate, for the applicant-petitioner.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL)
CM-6119-CWP-2024
Present application has been filed for fixing the main writ
petition i.e. CWP No.32041 of 2018, at an early actual date and to dispose
of the same keeping in view the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of
India in SLP No. 4531 of 2023 titled as 'State of Haryana and others Vs.
Balwinder Singh and others.
Notice of the application to the counsel opposite.
Ms. Vibha Tewari, learned Assistant Advocate General,
Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
Keeping in view the agreement between the learned counsel for
the parties, the application is allowed and on their joint request, the main
writ petition is taken up for hearing today itself.
1 of 2
Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:053042
CWP-32041-2018
1. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that after the
decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in SLP No. 4531 of 2023
titled as 'State of Haryana and others Vs. Balwinder Singh and others, a
bunch of petitions involving the same question of law has been decided by
this Court while passing order in CWP No.2158 of 2020 titled as Ashish
Sharma and others vs. State of Haryana and others, decided on
13.03.2024 and the question of law raised in the present writ petition is also
covered by the said judgment hence, the respondents are under an obligation
to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization under the policy
dated 01.10.2003 keeping in view the parameters therein.
2. Learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to rebut
the fact that the question of law raised in the present writ petition has
already been decided by this Court while passing order in Ashish Sharma's
case (supra).
3. Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is also
disposed of in terms of the judgment in Ashish Sharma's case (supra).
April 20, 2024 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI)
harsha JUDGE
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable : Yes/No
2 of 2
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!