Tuesday, 02, Jun, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bhasver Sharma And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 8100 P&H

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 8100 P&H
Judgement Date : 18 April, 2024

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Bhasver Sharma And Another vs State Of Punjab And Others on 18 April, 2024

                                       Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:052031
                                                                                 1

CRM-M No.7992 of 2024 (O&M)                                  2024:PHHC:052031

            IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                         AT CHANDIGARH

285
                                        CRM-M No.7992 of 2024 (O&M)
                                        Date of Decision: 18.04.2024


BHASVER SHARMA AND ANOTHER
                                                      ......Petitioner(s)

             Vs

STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
                                                      ....Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA

Present:     Ms. Shivya Sehgal, Advocate
             for the petitioner(s).

             Mr. Siddharth Sandhu, Asstt. A.G., Punjab.

             None for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
                   ****

HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral)

1. By way of present petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., prayer is

made for quashing of FIR No.99 dated 29.04.2023 registered under Sections 323,

324, 341, 34 IPC (Sections 326, 307 IPC added later on) at P.S. Haibowal, Police

Commissionerate, Ludhiana (Annexure P-1) along with all consequential

proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise.

2. Notice of motion was issued on 15.02.2024 and both the parties were

directed to appear before the Trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate for recording their

statements with regard to the validity of compromise.

3. In pursuance of the aforesaid order dated 15.02.2024 passed by this

Court, whereby the parties were directed to appear before the Trial Court for

getting their statements recorded as regards the veracity of compromise arrived at

1 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:052031

CRM-M No.7992 of 2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:052031

between them, a report dated 01.04.2024 has been received from the concerned

court, stating that compromise effected between the parties is genuine, voluntary

and without any coercion or undue influence. No accused has been declared as

proclaimed offender.

4. Petitioners are young boys. Though injury Nos.1, 2 and 4 have been

declared to be with sharp-edged weapon and the parties to the litigation are

neighbourers. At this stage, the settlement between them is going to result in

harmony between them which would improve their future relations.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners also volunteers to provide one

ECG Machine of M/s Contec Medical Systems Co. Ltd., having Model

No.ECG300GA to the Civil Hospital, Ludhiana so as further the public cause.

6. Thus once, the compromise has been arrived at between the parties

without any pressure and respondent Nos.2 and 3 having no objection as regards

quashing of FIR as well as all other subsequent proceedings arising out of the same

against the petitioner(s); there does not appear to be any impediment as regards

quashing of present FIR qua the petitioner(s). Even otherwise, in order to maintain

peace and harmony between the parties, particularly under the present

circumstances wherein the alleged offences have no societal interest involved, it

would be appropriate to render complete quietus to the aforementioned dispute by

quashing the FIR on the basis of compromise entered into between the parties.

7. The parties having settled their dispute so as to live in peace in future,

no useful purpose would be served by proceeding further with the criminal

proceedings. In the light of above developments, no cause remains for the Trial

Court to invest further time and effort in adjudicating this FIR. The compromise in

2 of 3

Neutral Citation No:=2024:PHHC:052031

CRM-M No.7992 of 2024 (O&M) 2024:PHHC:052031

question is even found to be fully in consonance with the direction issued by the

Court in Kulwinder Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Punjab 2007(3) RCR (Criminal)

1052 and Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab & Anr., 2012(4) RCR (Crl.) 543.

8. Thus, in view of the aforesaid report, accompanied by statements of

both the parties as well as keeping in mind the law laid down in the

aforementioned judgments, the FIR No.99 dated 29.04.2023 registered under

Sections 323, 324, 341, 34 IPC (Sections 326, 307 IPC added later on) at P.S.

Haibowal, Police Commissionerate, Ludhiana as well as all the subsequent

proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed qua the petitioner(s).

9. Accordingly, petition stands, allowed however subject to providing

one ECG Machine of M/s Contec Medical Systems Co. Ltd., having Model

No.ECG300GA to the Civil Hospital, Ludhiana as volunteered by the petitioners

against receipt issued by the concerned CMO. A copy of the same along with

photograph of the ECG Machine shall be forwarded to the office of learned State

counsel, within a period of two weeks from today.



                                               (HARKESH MANUJA)
April 18, 2024                                     JUDGE
Atik
             Whether speaking/reasoned         Yes/No
             Whether reportable                Yes/No




                                      3 of 3

 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : MAIMS

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter